Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症三种电生理测量方法的一致性研究。

A concordance study of three electrophysiological measures in schizophrenia.

作者信息

Louchart-de la Chapelle Sandrine, Nkam Irène, Houy Emmanuelle, Belmont Angélique, Ménard Jean-François, Roussignol Anne-Claire, Siwek Ophélie, Mezerai Mustapha, Guillermou Marion, Fouldrin Gaël, Levillain Daniel, Dollfus Sonia, Campion Dominique, Thibaut Florence

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Rouen University Hospital Charles Nicolle, 1 rue de Germont 76031 Rouen Cedex, France.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;162(3):466-74. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.466.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors evaluated concordance rates among three electrophysiological measures in patients with schizophrenia, nonschizophrenic first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients, and healthy comparison subjects. The purpose of the study was to provide data for defining a common endophenotype for genetic studies of schizophrenia and for improving the criteria for diagnosis.

METHOD

P50 event-related potential inhibition, antisaccade, and smooth pursuit eye tracking paradigms were measured. Data for all three paradigms were available for 81 patients with schizophrenia, 25 parents of patients with schizophrenia, and 60 healthy comparison subjects.

RESULTS

The schizophrenia patients and the patients' parents showed a high rate of inhibitory deficits measured by the P50 inhibition and antisaccade paradigms. Both groups had a high prevalence of eye tracking dysfunction. Smooth pursuit gain and the error rate in the antisaccade paradigm were significantly correlated in the schizophrenia patients and the parents, whereas P50 inhibition showed no correlation with smooth pursuit gain or antisaccade paradigm measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite superficial similarities, two paradigms designed to measure central inhibition processes (antisaccade and P50 inhibition) do not appear to reflect the same neurobiological substrates. In contrast, the convergence in performance data for the antisaccade and eye tracking paradigms suggests that the neural circuitry underlying these tasks may overlap. P50 inhibition and antisaccade errors were the optimal paradigms for discrimination between comparison subjects, patients with schizophrenia, and the parents of patients with schizophrenia.

摘要

目的

作者评估了精神分裂症患者、精神分裂症患者的非精神分裂症一级亲属以及健康对照受试者三种电生理测量方法之间的一致性率。该研究的目的是为精神分裂症的遗传学研究定义一个共同的内表型以及改进诊断标准提供数据。

方法

测量了P50事件相关电位抑制、反扫视和平稳跟踪眼动范式。81名精神分裂症患者、25名精神分裂症患者的父母以及60名健康对照受试者可获得所有三种范式的数据。

结果

通过P50抑制和反扫视范式测量,精神分裂症患者及其父母表现出较高的抑制缺陷率。两组的眼动跟踪功能障碍患病率均较高。在精神分裂症患者及其父母中,平稳跟踪增益与反扫视范式中的错误率显著相关,而P50抑制与平稳跟踪增益或反扫视范式测量结果无关。

结论

尽管表面上有相似之处,但旨在测量中枢抑制过程的两种范式(反扫视和P50抑制)似乎并未反映相同的神经生物学底物。相比之下,反扫视和眼动跟踪范式性能数据的趋同表明,这些任务背后的神经回路可能重叠。P50抑制和反扫视错误是区分对照受试者、精神分裂症患者以及精神分裂症患者父母的最佳范式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验