Belton D J
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, New Zealand.
Dev Biol (Basel). 2004;119:457-61.
The 2001 outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) in the United Kingdom heightened public concern in New Zealand about the economic consequences of an outbreak of FMD, and resulted in the Reserve Bank and Treasury conducting an assessment of the macro-economic impact of a small FMD outbreak in New Zealand. The study was based on a relatively small outbreak in which 50 properties were infected over a period of two months. Cumulative losses calculated over two years from the beginning of the hypothetical outbreak were estimated at around NZ dollars 10 billion, a figure twice as large as the initial Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry estimate. The main reason for this difference is that the Reserve Bank study included the additional macro-economic effects of a slump in domestic demand. The study also demonstrated that in New Zealand under the conditions of the current OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code for FMD, the economic impact of any programme to control FMD by vaccination in which vaccinated animals are not slaughtered, is significantly worse than rapid eradication by stamping out.
2001年英国口蹄疫疫情的爆发,加剧了新西兰公众对口蹄疫疫情经济后果的担忧,导致储备银行和财政部对新西兰小规模口蹄疫疫情的宏观经济影响进行评估。该研究基于一次相对小规模的疫情,即在两个月内有50处养殖场被感染。从假设疫情开始起计算的两年累计损失估计约为100亿新西兰元,这一数字是最初农林部估计的两倍。造成这种差异的主要原因是储备银行的研究纳入了国内需求下滑带来的额外宏观经济影响。该研究还表明,在新西兰现行的世界动物卫生组织口蹄疫陆生动物卫生法典条件下,任何不屠宰接种疫苗动物的疫苗接种口蹄疫防控计划的经济影响,都比扑杀快速根除的情况要严重得多。