Hoefs John C, Sheikh Muhammad Y, Guerrero Heather, Milne Norah
Division of Gastroenterology/Liver Disease Program, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine/ UCI Medical Center, Orange, California 92868, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Feb;50(2):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-1596-y.
The quantitative liver-spleen scan (QLSS) can estimate the functional hepatic mass and the organ volumes by precise measurement of sulfur colloid (SC) distribution. The normal range determined in prior studies was estimated from patients with absence of chronic liver disease in which intense fasting appeared to produce slightly abnormal values. This study was to determine the effect of fasting or fed status and colloid particle size on quantitative measurements from the QLSS in a small cohort of normal individuals. Twelve persons without any medical problems had QLSS taken twice, 2 weeks apart, one fasting and one postprandial. Patients were scanned after injection of 5-6 mCi of SC; six patients were given solution A (5- to 12-microm particle size) and six patients solution B (2- to 12-microm particle size). SPECT and planar analysis were performed. SC distribution of total counts between the liver and the spleen {[L/(L + S)]t ratio}, liver-spleen index (LSI), and liver-bone marrow index (LBI) were calculated. The perfused hepatic mass (PHM) is the average of the LSI and LBI. Spleen and liver volumes are expressed as milliliters per pound ideal body weight (IBW). Results showed that the liver and spleen volumes (solution B postprandial, 9.27 +/- 2.48 and 1.47 +/- 0.57 ml/lb IBW, respectively) and LBI were not affected by the type of SC solution or by ingestion status. L/(L + S) total and pixel count ratios were significantly higher for solution B and postprandial studies. [L/(L + S)]t, LSI, and PHM increased significantly (P < 0.05) from fasting to postprandial for solution A (0.71 +/- 0.13 vs 0.79 +/- 0.08, 80 +/- 14 vs 91 +/- 8, and 102 +/- 10 vs 106 +/- 8, respectively) and for solution B (0.81 +/- 0.05 vs 0.90 +/- 0.02, 86 +/- 4 vs 95 +/- 3, and 101 +/- 5 vs 110 +/- 3). Neither fasting nor postprandial LSI and PHM were significantly different between solution A and solution B. We conclude the following. (1) The QLSS functional indices in "true" normal patients fall within the previously reported normal range. (2) Calculated liver and spleen volumes are not altered by fasting or sulfur colloid particle size. (3) Fasting significantly decreased the [L/(L + S)]t, LSI, and PHM. (4) A postprandial scan may be preferable since the normal values for [L/(L + S)]t, LSI, and PHM are greater, with a narrower range, than fasting values.
定量肝脾扫描(QLSS)可通过精确测量硫胶体(SC)分布来估计功能性肝质量和器官体积。先前研究确定的正常范围是根据无慢性肝病患者估算得出的,在这些患者中,严格禁食似乎会产生略微异常的值。本研究旨在确定禁食或进食状态以及胶体颗粒大小对一小群正常个体QLSS定量测量结果的影响。12名无任何健康问题的受试者接受了两次QLSS检查,间隔2周,一次禁食,一次餐后进行。在注射5 - 6毫居里的SC后对患者进行扫描;6名患者给予溶液A(粒径为5至12微米),6名患者给予溶液B(粒径为2至12微米)。进行了单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)和平面分析。计算肝与脾之间总计数的SC分布{[L/(L + S)]t比值}、肝脾指数(LSI)和肝骨髓指数(LBI)。灌注肝质量(PHM)是LSI和LBI的平均值。脾和肝体积以每磅理想体重(IBW)的毫升数表示。结果显示,肝和脾体积(餐后溶液B组分别为9.27±2.48和1.47±0.57毫升/磅IBW)以及LBI不受SC溶液类型或摄入状态的影响。溶液B和餐后研究的L/(L + S)总计数和像素计数比值显著更高。对于溶液A,从禁食到餐后,[L/(L + S)]t、LSI和PHM显著增加(P < 0.05)(分别为0.71±0.13对0.79±0.08、80±14对91±8、102±10对106±8);对于溶液B,[L/(L + S)]t、LSI和PHM也显著增加(分别为0.81±0.05对0.90±0.02、86±4对95±3、101±5对110±3)。溶液A和溶液B之间,无论是禁食还是餐后,LSI和PHM均无显著差异。我们得出以下结论。(1)“真正”正常患者的QLSS功能指标落在先前报告的正常范围内。(2)计算得出的肝和脾体积不受禁食或硫胶体颗粒大小的影响。(3)禁食显著降低[L/(L + S)]t、LSI和PHM。(4)餐后扫描可能更可取,因为[L/(L + S)]t、LSI和PHM的正常值更高,且范围比禁食值更窄。