Wong C S, Minkin S, Hill R P
Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital/Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Radiother Oncol. 1992 Mar;23(3):176-84. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(92)90328-r.
The application of the linear-quadratic (LQ) model to describe iso-effective fractionation schedules for dose fraction sizes less than 2 Gy has been controversial. This paper describes experiments in which the effect of daily fractionated irradiation given with a wide range of fraction sizes was assessed in rat cervical spinal cord. The first group of rats were given doses in 1, 2, 4, 8 and 40 daily fractions. The second group of animals received three initial "top-up" doses of 9 Gy given once daily, representing three-quarters of tolerance, followed by doses in 1, 2, 10, 20, 30 and 40 daily fractions. The fractionated portion of the irradiation schedule therefore constituted only the final quarter of the tolerance dose. The endpoint of the experiments was paralysis of the forelimbs secondary to white matter necrosis. Direct analysis of data from experiments with full course fractionation up to 40 daily fractions (25.0-1.98 Gy per fraction) indicated consistency with the LQ model yielding an alpha/beta value of 2.41 Gy. Analysis of data from experiments in which the three "top-up" doses were followed by up to 10 fractions (10.0-1.64 Gy per fraction) gave an alpha/beta value of 3.41 Gy. However, data from "top-up" experiments with 20, 30 and 40 fraction (1.60-0.55 Gy per fraction) were inconsistent with the LQ model and gave a very small alpha/beta value of 0.48 Gy. It is concluded that the LQ model based on data from large doses per fraction underestimates the sparing effect of small doses per fraction provided sufficient time is allowed between each fraction for repair of sublethal damage.
应用线性二次(LQ)模型来描述剂量分割小于2 Gy时的等效分割方案一直存在争议。本文描述了一些实验,在大鼠颈脊髓中评估了给予多种分割剂量的每日分割照射的效果。第一组大鼠接受1、2、4、8和40次每日分割剂量照射。第二组动物先接受三次初始“补充”剂量,每次9 Gy,每日一次,相当于耐受剂量的四分之三,随后接受1、2、10、20、30和40次每日分割剂量照射。因此,照射方案的分割部分仅构成耐受剂量的最后四分之一。实验的终点是继发于白质坏死的前肢麻痹。对高达40次每日分割(每次分割25.0 - 1.98 Gy)的全程分割实验数据的直接分析表明,与LQ模型一致,得出α/β值为2.41 Gy。对在三次“补充”剂量后再进行多达10次分割(每次分割10.0 - 1.64 Gy)的实验数据进行分析,得出α/β值为3.41 Gy。然而,20、30和40次分割(每次分割1.60 - 0.55 Gy)的“补充”实验数据与LQ模型不一致,得出非常小的α/β值为0.48 Gy。得出的结论是,基于每分次大剂量数据的LQ模型低估了每分次小剂量的保护作用,前提是每次分割之间有足够的时间用于亚致死损伤的修复。