Wakita Takafumi
Department of Psychology and Human Developmental Sciences, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2004 Oct;75(4):331-8. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.75.331.
This study aimed to assess the distance between adjacent categories of rating scales. It is common practice to treat ordinal variables as interval-scaled variables in the analysis of rating scales. Strictly speaking, however, ordinal scale data should be treated as such, since there is little reason and assurance that they are equivalent to interval variables. In view of this practice, this study proposes a method to assess the interval of rating scales, and analyzes empirical data in order to examine the results obtained by the method. This method is based upon the generalized partial credit model which is one of item response theory (IRT) models. The experiment was carried out on two data sets that differed only on the verbal phrasing of the rating. Main results of the study were: 1) the difference in item content (positive or negative) affects the width of a neutral category; and 2) the distance between categories differs significantly reflecting the difference in verbal phrasing.
本研究旨在评估评分量表相邻类别之间的间距。在评分量表分析中,将有序变量当作等距量表变量处理是常见的做法。然而,严格来说,顺序量表数据应按其本来面目处理,因为几乎没有理由且无法保证它们等同于等距变量。鉴于这种做法,本研究提出一种评估评分量表间距的方法,并分析实证数据以检验该方法所得结果。此方法基于广义部分计分模型,该模型是项目反应理论(IRT)模型之一。实验是在两个仅在评分的文字表述上有所不同的数据集上进行的。该研究的主要结果为:1)项目内容(正面或负面)的差异会影响中性类别的宽度;2)类别之间的间距存在显著差异,反映了文字表述上的差异。