Nakamura Tatsuya, Takahashi Hakuo
Clinical Central Laboratory, Kansai Medical University Hospital, 10-15 Fumizono, Moriguchi, Osaka, 570-8507, Japan.
Jpn J Antibiot. 2004 Dec;57(6):465-74.
We compared the antimicrobial activity of commercially available oral cephem agents, cefaclor (CCL), cefroxadine (CXD), cefdinir (CFDN), cefixime (CFIX), cefpodoxime (CPDX), cefteram (CFTM), cefcapene (CFPN), and cefditoren (CDTR), against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pyogenes, and ESBL-producing bacteria isolated from clinical materials in Kansai Medical University Hospital between 2002 and 2003. Based on the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) theory, we determined the concentration of each agent at which the time above MIC (TAM) value was 40% or more, and calculated the rate of efficacy against each type of bacteria. In S. pneumoniae strains, the MIC(50,80,90) values of CDTR were 0.25, 0.5, and 0.5 microg/ml, respectively, lower than those of the other agents, demonstrating the most potent antimicrobial activity. However, the efficacy rate for CDTR calculated based on the PK/PD theory was 58.5%. CFTM showed the highest efficacy rate (66.1%). In H. influenzae strains, the antimicrobial activity of CDTR was most potent, followed by that of CFTM and that of CFPN/CFIX. The MIC90 value of CDTR was lowest (0.25 microg/ml), followed by that of CFTM (0.5 microg/ml). The efficacy rate for CDTR was 100%. This result supports that CDTR frequently eradicates H. influenzae. In E. coli strains, the MIC90 values of the above agents, excluding CCL and CXD, ranged from 0.5 to 1 microg/ml. The antimicrobial activity of CFIX against K. pneumoniae was most potent, followed by that of CFDN/CPDX and that of CFTM. In ESBL-producing bacteria, most agents showed an MIC90 value of more than 4 microg/ml. In S. agalactiae and S. pyogenes strains, all of the agents showed satisfactory MIC values. In methi- cillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains, CFDN and CXD showed a high efficacy rate, whereas the efficacy rates for the other agents were low. The frequent use of oral agents has increased the number of cephem-resistant bacteria. ESBL-producing bacteria become highly resistant, and the presence or absence of response can be readily evaluated. However, when a mutation of penicillin-binding protein (PBP) occurs, drug resistance is less marked. Therefore, it is difficult to evaluate the treatment response in many cases. In S. pneumoniae strains, the efficacy rates for all of the agents were low in the evaluation using the PK/PD theory, suggesting that a dose higher than the standard dose should be established. Thus, in the future, the efficacy should be evaluated based on the PK/PD theory, appropriate antimicrobial treatment should be administered, and the administration method that does not increase the number of resistant bacteria must be established.
我们比较了市售口服头孢菌素类药物头孢克洛(CCL)、头孢沙定(CXD)、头孢地尼(CFDN)、头孢克肟(CFIX)、头孢泊肟酯(CPDX)、头孢特仑(CFTM)、头孢卡品(CFPN)和头孢妥仑(CDTR)对2002年至2003年期间从关西医科大学医院临床样本中分离出的肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌、大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、无乳链球菌、化脓性链球菌以及产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)细菌的抗菌活性。基于药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)理论,我们确定了每种药物在高于最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的时间(T>MIC)值达到40%或更高时的浓度,并计算了对每种细菌的有效率。在肺炎链球菌菌株中,CDTR的MIC(50、80、90)值分别为0.25、0.5和0.5μg/ml,低于其他药物,显示出最强的抗菌活性。然而,根据PK/PD理论计算的CDTR有效率为58.5%。CFTM显示出最高的有效率(66.1%)。在流感嗜血杆菌菌株中,CDTR的抗菌活性最强,其次是CFTM以及CFPN/CFIX。CDTR的MIC90值最低(0.25μg/ml),其次是CFTM(0.5μg/ml)。CDTR的有效率为100%。这一结果支持CDTR经常能根除流感嗜血杆菌。在大肠埃希菌菌株中,除CCL和CXD外,上述药物的MIC90值范围为0.5至1μg/ml。CFIX对肺炎克雷伯菌的抗菌活性最强,其次是CFDN/CPDX以及CFTM。在产ESBL细菌中,大多数药物的MIC90值超过4μg/ml。在无乳链球菌和化脓性链球菌菌株中,所有药物的MIC值均令人满意。在甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌株中,CFDN和CXD显示出较高的有效率,而其他药物的有效率较低。口服药物的频繁使用增加了头孢菌素耐药菌的数量。产ESBL细菌变得高度耐药,且反应的有无可轻易评估。然而,当青霉素结合蛋白(PBP)发生突变时,耐药性不太明显。因此,在许多情况下难以评估治疗反应。在肺炎链球菌菌株中,使用PK/PD理论评估时所有药物的有效率均较低,这表明应制定高于标准剂量的剂量。因此,未来应基于PK/PD理论评估疗效,给予适当的抗菌治疗,并建立不增加耐药菌数量的给药方法。