Boto G R, Gómez P A, De la Cruz J, Lobato R D
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid.
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005 Feb;16(1):39-49.
During the past "Decade of the Brain" several neuroprotective agents have been tested in phase III clinical trials for severe head injury (SHI) but unfortunately none of them significantly improved the outcome of these patients. In contrast to the success achieved by these drugs in animal laboratory studies, the results in terms of neuroprotection in the clinical setting have been disappointing. This paper has been divided in three parts: in the first one, we summarize the pathophysiological mechanisms related to SHI, targeted by the neuroprotective agents. In the second part we review the main clinical trials carried out for SHI to date, and in the third one, we analyze the possible reasons that explain why these agents have failed to show efficacy.
在过去的“脑的十年”期间,有几种神经保护剂在重度颅脑损伤(SHI)的III期临床试验中进行了测试,但遗憾的是,它们都没有显著改善这些患者的预后。与这些药物在动物实验室研究中取得的成功形成对比的是,在临床环境中这些药物在神经保护方面的结果令人失望。本文分为三个部分:第一部分,我们总结了神经保护剂所针对的与重度颅脑损伤相关的病理生理机制。第二部分,我们回顾了迄今为止针对重度颅脑损伤开展的主要临床试验,第三部分,我们分析了这些药物未能显示出疗效的可能原因。