Lund Lars H, Aaronson Keith D, Mancini Donna M
Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;95(6):734-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.11.024.
The Heart Failure Survival Score (HFSS) and peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO2) accurately assess mortality in ambulatory patients who have advanced heart failure and are referred for initial cardiac transplant evaluation. We investigated the prognostic value of the HFSS and peak VO2 when applied serially to these patients. This study included 227 adults (mean age +/- SD 52 +/- 10 years old) who presented for reevaluation >60 days after initial evaluation (352 +/- 238 days). The HFSS was determined from mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, left ventricular ejection fraction, serum sodium, peak VO2, heart failure etiology, and width of QRS complex. Survival without reevaluation, United Network of Organ Sharing 1 transplant, or left ventricular assist device was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring at United Network of Organ Sharing 2 transplant. Survival differed by HFSS stratum (p <0.001) and by peak VO2 stratum (p <0.001). Patients whose HFSS or peak VO2 deteriorated from low risk to medium or high risk had lower survival rates than did patients whose values remained at low risk (p <0.01 and p <0.001, respectively). Patients who started at medium or high risk and improved to low risk tended to have higher survival rates than those who remained medium or high risk (p = 0.06 and p <0.16, respectively). Patients who improved to low risk had a 1-year survival rate of 72% for HFSS and peak VO2. However, patients who improved to low risk and were treated with beta blockers had a 1-year survival rate (89% for HFSS and 83% for peak VO2) comparable to that after transplant (84%). Peak VO2 and the HFSS can be successfully used for serial evaluation of mortality risk in ambulatory patients who have advanced heart failure.
心力衰竭生存评分(HFSS)和峰值运动耗氧量(VO2)可准确评估晚期心力衰竭且被转诊进行初始心脏移植评估的门诊患者的死亡率。我们研究了HFSS和峰值VO2连续应用于这些患者时的预后价值。本研究纳入了227名成年人(平均年龄±标准差52±10岁),他们在初始评估后>60天(352±238天)前来重新评估。HFSS由平均动脉血压、心率、左心室射血分数、血清钠、峰值VO2、心力衰竭病因和QRS波群宽度确定。通过Kaplan-Meier法确定无重新评估、器官共享联合网络1级移植或左心室辅助装置情况下的生存情况,并在器官共享联合网络2级移植时进行删失。生存率在HFSS分层中存在差异(p<0.001),在峰值VO2分层中也存在差异(p<0.001)。HFSS或峰值VO2从低风险恶化至中风险或高风险的患者,其生存率低于那些风险值保持在低风险的患者(分别为p<0.01和p<0.001)。起始为中风险或高风险且改善至低风险的患者,其生存率往往高于那些仍为中风险或高风险的患者(分别为p = 0.06和p<0.16)。改善至低风险的患者,HFSS和峰值VO2的1年生存率为72%。然而,改善至低风险并接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者,其1年生存率(HFSS为89%,峰值VO2为83%)与移植后的生存率(84%)相当。峰值VO2和HFSS可成功用于对晚期心力衰竭门诊患者的死亡风险进行连续评估。