Algood S David, Cooper Rory A, Fitzgerald Shirley G, Cooper Rosemarie, Boninger Michael L
Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Mar;86(3):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.05.017.
To test the differences between a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair (PAPAW) and a traditional manual wheelchair while performing common driving activities and to assess their relative merits for people with tetraplegia.
Repeated measures.
An activities of daily living (ADL) laboratory within a rehabilitation research center.
Fifteen full-time manual wheelchair users with tetraplegia due to a spinal cord injury.
Participants propelled both their own manual wheelchairs and a PAPAW 3 times over an ADL course. The order in which the 2 different wheelchairs were presented to the participants was randomized.
Each participant's heart rate was monitored throughout testing by a digital, wireless heart-rate monitor. Time to complete the course was recorded, and participants were surveyed with a visual analog scale after the first, third, fourth, and sixth trials to determine the ease of completing each obstacle and their ergonomic preferences between the 2 wheelchairs. Participants also were observed throughout the trials to determine how much assistance they needed to complete each obstacle course.
After using a Bonferroni adjustment, 4 obstacles (carpet, dimple strips, up a ramp, up a curb cut) were rated as being significantly easier ( P <.001) to complete when using the PAPAW. Participants also showed a significant decrease in mean heart rate throughout all 3 trials ( P =.015, P =.001, P =.003, respectively) when using a PAPAW. The amount of assistance needed by participants, the responses to ergonomic questions, and the overall time to complete the ADL course did not differ significantly between the 2 wheelchairs.
For subjects with tetraplegia, PAPAWs have the potential to improve functional capabilities during certain ADLs, especially when propelling up ramps, over uneven surfaces, and over thick carpet.
测试推 rim 激活式动力辅助轮椅(PAPAW)与传统手动轮椅在进行常见驾驶活动时的差异,并评估它们对四肢瘫痪者的相对优点。
重复测量。
康复研究中心内的日常生活(ADL)实验室。
15 名因脊髓损伤导致四肢瘫痪的全职手动轮椅使用者。
参与者在 ADL 课程中分别使用自己的手动轮椅和 PAPAW 推动 3 次。向参与者展示这两种不同轮椅的顺序是随机的。
在整个测试过程中,通过数字无线心率监测器监测每位参与者的心率。记录完成课程的时间,并在第一次试验、第三次试验、第四次试验和第六次试验后,用视觉模拟量表对参与者进行调查,以确定完成每个障碍物的难易程度以及他们对这两种轮椅的人体工程学偏好。在整个试验过程中还观察了参与者,以确定他们完成每个障碍课程需要多少帮助。
在使用 Bonferroni 校正后,发现使用 PAPAW 时,4 个障碍物(地毯、凹纹条、上坡道、上路边坡道)被评为完成起来明显更容易(P <.001)。在使用 PAPAW 时,参与者在所有 3 次试验中的平均心率也显著下降(分别为 P =.015、P =.001、P =.003)。参与者所需的帮助量、对人体工程学问题的回答以及完成 ADL 课程的总时间在这两种轮椅之间没有显著差异。
对于四肢瘫痪的受试者,PAPAW 在某些日常生活活动中有可能提高功能能力,特别是在上坡道、不平坦表面和厚地毯上推动时。