Suppr超能文献

穿透性腹部刺伤伴脏器或网膜外露时选择性观察与常规探查方法的前瞻性比较。

A prospective comparison of the selective observation and routine exploration methods for penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration.

作者信息

Arikan Soykan, Kocakusak Ahmet, Yucel Ahmet F, Adas Gokhan

机构信息

Haseki Education and Research Hospital, General Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2005 Mar;58(3):526-32. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000152498.71380.3e.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both routine laparotomy and selective observation methods have been used in the treatment of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration. There still are some conflicts about these treatment methods.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2003, 61 patients treated in the authors' emergency clinic because of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration were evaluated prospectively. Excepting those with absolute indications for mandatory laparotomy, these patients were treated by either routine laparotomy or selective observation methods. Their prognosis, rates of unnecessary laparotomy, length of hospital stay, and complications were compared using Fisher's exact test and Student's t test.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent mandatory laparotomy and were therefore excluded from the study. The overall incidence of the patients who had no significant abdominal pathology was 54.1% (33/61). The overall incidence of significant injuries among the asymptomatic patients was 36.5% (19/52). Routine laparotomy was performed for 21 patients, who experienced unnecessary laparotomy and complication rates of 33.33% and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay in this group was 137.38 +/- 53.25 hours. Of 31 patients, 24 who had been treated by selective observation methods were discharged without laparotomy. The unnecessary laparotomy and complication rates for this group were 6.45% (28.6% for the patients treated surgically) and 3.2%, respectively, whereas the mean length of hospital stay for this group was 81.22 +/- 42.46 hours. There were statistically significant differences in terms of unnecessary laparotomy rates and mean lengths of hospital stay, but no difference in terms of complication rates.

CONCLUSION

The selective observation method is safe and superior to routine laparotomy for the treatment of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with omentum evisceration.

摘要

背景

常规剖腹手术和选择性观察方法都曾用于治疗伴有脏器或网膜脱出的腹部刺伤。关于这些治疗方法仍存在一些争议。

方法

1998年至2003年间,对作者所在急诊诊所收治的61例因腹部刺伤伴有脏器或网膜脱出的患者进行了前瞻性评估。除有绝对指征需行急诊剖腹手术的患者外,这些患者采用常规剖腹手术或选择性观察方法进行治疗。使用Fisher精确检验和Student t检验比较他们的预后、不必要剖腹手术率、住院时间和并发症情况。

结果

9例患者接受了急诊剖腹手术,因此被排除在研究之外。腹部无明显病变患者的总体发生率为54.1%(33/61)。无症状患者中严重损伤的总体发生率为36.5%(19/52)。21例患者接受了常规剖腹手术,其不必要剖腹手术率和并发症发生率分别为33.33%和19%。该组患者的平均住院时间为137.38±53.25小时。31例患者中,24例采用选择性观察方法治疗,未行剖腹手术即出院。该组不必要剖腹手术率和并发症发生率分别为6.45%(手术治疗患者为28.6%)和3.2%,而该组患者的平均住院时间为81.22±42.46小时。在不必要剖腹手术率和平均住院时间方面存在统计学显著差异,但在并发症发生率方面无差异。

结论

对于治疗伴有网膜脱出的腹部刺伤,选择性观察方法安全且优于常规剖腹手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验