Berti J A, de Faria E C, Oliveira H C F
Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005 Mar;38(3):391-8. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2005000300010. Epub 2005 Mar 8.
We determined whether over-expression of one of the three genes involved in reverse cholesterol transport, apolipoprotein (apo) AI, lecithin-cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), or of their combinations influenced the development of diet-induced atherosclerosis. Eight genotypic groups of mice were studied (AI, LCAT, CETP, LCAT/AI, CETP/AI, LCAT/CETP, LCAT/AI/CETP, and non-transgenic) after four months on an atherogenic diet. The extent of atherosclerosis was assessed by morphometric analysis of lipid-stained areas in the aortic roots. The relative influence (R2) of genotype, sex, total cholesterol, and its main sub-fraction levels on atherosclerotic lesion size was determined by multiple linear regression analysis. Whereas apo AI (R2 = 0.22, P < 0.001) and CETP (R2 = 0.13, P < 0.01) expression reduced lesion size, the LCAT (R2 = 0.16, P < 0.005) and LCAT/AI (R2 = 0.13, P < 0.003) genotypes had the opposite effect. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of developing atherosclerotic lesions greater than the 50th percentile was 4.3-fold lower for the apo AI transgenic mice than for non-transgenic mice, and was 3.0-fold lower for male than for female mice. These results show that apo AI overexpression decreased the risk of developing large atherosclerotic lesions but was not sufficient to reduce the atherogenic effect of LCAT when both transgenes were co-expressed. On the other hand, CETP expression was sufficient to eliminate the deleterious effect of LCAT and LCAT/AI overexpression. Therefore, increasing each step of the reverse cholesterol transport per se does not necessarily imply protection against atherosclerosis while CETP expression can change specific atherogenic scenarios.
我们研究了参与逆向胆固醇转运的三个基因之一,即载脂蛋白(apo)AI、卵磷脂胆固醇酰基转移酶(LCAT)和胆固醇酯转运蛋白(CETP),或它们的组合的过表达是否会影响饮食诱导的动脉粥样硬化的发展。在接受致动脉粥样硬化饮食四个月后,对八组基因类型的小鼠(AI、LCAT、CETP、LCAT/AI、CETP/AI、LCAT/CETP、LCAT/AI/CETP和非转基因小鼠)进行了研究。通过对主动脉根部脂质染色区域的形态计量分析来评估动脉粥样硬化的程度。通过多元线性回归分析确定基因型、性别、总胆固醇及其主要亚组分水平对动脉粥样硬化病变大小的相对影响(R2)。虽然apo AI(R2 = 0.22,P < 0.001)和CETP(R2 = 0.13,P < 0.01)的表达减小了病变大小,但LCAT(R2 = 0.16,P < 0.005)和LCAT/AI(R2 = 0.13,P < 0.003)基因型却有相反的作用。逻辑回归分析显示,apo AI转基因小鼠发生大于第50百分位数的动脉粥样硬化病变的风险比非转基因小鼠低4.3倍,雄性小鼠比雌性小鼠低3.0倍。这些结果表明,apo AI的过表达降低了发生大型动脉粥样硬化病变的风险,但当两个转基因共同表达时,不足以降低LCAT的致动脉粥样硬化作用。另一方面,CETP的表达足以消除LCAT和LCAT/AI过表达的有害影响。因此,增加逆向胆固醇转运的每一步本身并不一定意味着对动脉粥样硬化有保护作用,而CETP的表达可以改变特定的致动脉粥样硬化情况。