Suppr超能文献

在轻度至中度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAS)中,除持续气道正压通气(CPAP)外口服茶碱的短期效应

Short-term effects of oral theophylline in addition to CPAP in mild to moderate OSAS.

作者信息

Orth Maritta M, Grootoonk Sandra, Duchna Hans-Werner, de Zeeuw Justus, Walther Jörg W, Bauer Torsten T, Schultze-Werninghaus Gerhard, Rasche Kurt

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pneumology, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Medical Clinic III, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, D-44789 Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2005 Apr;99(4):471-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.09.010.

Abstract

Theophylline is effective in the treatment of central apneas and periodic breathing. In obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), results of pharmacological monotherapy with theophylline are inconsistent. The present study investigates whether additional theophylline in patients with OSAS and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy might improve ventilation, lower effective CPAP pressure levels or affect sleep architecture. Patients with mild to moderate OSAS (mean apnea index [AI] 12.8+/-11.7) and CPAP therapy (Autoset system; n=16, all male) received either 900 mg of oral sustained-release theophylline (T) or placebo (P) on two separate nights, 3 days apart, using a randomized double-blind crossover study design. There was no change in AI (T: 0.7+/-1.4 vs. P: 0.7+/-0.6/h; P=0.3) or apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; T: 4.3+/-3.3 vs. P: 4.5+/-3.7/h; P=0.84) when theophylline was added to CPAP therapy. We observed no difference in mean CPAP pressure (T: 6.9+/-2.1 vs. P: 6.7+/-1.9 cm H2O; P=0.7) or 95% pressure percentiles (T: 9.7+/-2.7 vs. P: 9.3+/-2.1cm H2O; P=0.3) when nights with theophylline were compared to placebo nights. Theophylline reduced significantly total sleep time (T: 290.6+/-58.9 vs. P: 338.0+/-40.1 min; P=0.02) and thus sleep efficiency (SE; T: 70.5+/-14.9%, P: 82.0+/-70.5%; P=0.005). Rapid eye movement and slow wave sleep were not affected. Oral theophylline did not show any additional effects on ventilation parameters or pressures in patients with mild to moderate OSAS once CPAP therapy has been successfully installed. SE was reduced with theophylline with unchanged sleep architecture. The role of oral theophylline may be in patients with predominately central apneas not eligible for ventilation therapy or severe cases.

摘要

氨茶碱对中枢性呼吸暂停和周期性呼吸有效。在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)中,氨茶碱药物单一疗法的效果并不一致。本研究调查了在接受持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗的OSAS患者中加用氨茶碱是否可改善通气、降低有效CPAP压力水平或影响睡眠结构。采用随机双盲交叉研究设计,对轻度至中度OSAS(平均呼吸暂停指数[AI]为12.8±11.7)且接受CPAP治疗(自动调压系统;n = 16,均为男性)的患者,在相隔3天的两个不同夜晚分别给予900 mg口服缓释氨茶碱(T)或安慰剂(P)。在CPAP治疗中加用氨茶碱时,AI(T组:0.7±1.4次/小时 vs. P组:0.7±0.6次/小时;P = 0.3)或呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI;T组:4.3±3.3次/小时 vs. P组:4.5±3.7次/小时;P = 0.84)均无变化。将服用氨茶碱的夜晚与服用安慰剂的夜晚进行比较时,我们观察到平均CPAP压力(T组:6.9±2.1 cmH₂O vs. P组:6.7±1.9 cmH₂O;P = 0.7)或95%压力百分位数(T组:9.7±2.7 cmH₂O vs. P组:9.3±2.1 cmH₂O;P = 0.3)无差异。氨茶碱显著缩短了总睡眠时间(T组:290.6±58.9分钟 vs. P组:338.0±40.1分钟;P = 0.02),从而降低了睡眠效率(SE;T组:70.5±14.9%,P组:82.0±7.5%;P = 0.005)。快速眼动睡眠和慢波睡眠未受影响。对于轻度至中度OSAS患者,一旦成功实施CPAP治疗,口服氨茶碱对通气参数或压力未显示出任何额外影响。氨茶碱降低了SE,但睡眠结构未改变。口服氨茶碱的作用可能体现在主要为中枢性呼吸暂停且不符合通气治疗条件的患者或重症患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验