Suppr超能文献

性交疼痛应保留在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-V)中作为性功能障碍吗?一个痛苦的分类决策。

Should dyspareunia be retained as a sexual dysfunction in DSM-V? A painful classification decision.

作者信息

Binik Yitzchak M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McGill University, and Sex and Couple Therapy Service, McGill University Health Center (RVH), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2005 Feb;34(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-0998-4.

Abstract

The DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) classifies dyspareunia as a sexual dysfunction and describes it as a "sexual pain" disorder. This classification has been widely accepted with little controversy despite the absence of a theoretical rationale or supporting empirical data. An examination of the validity of this classification suggests that there is little current justification for the use of the term "sexual pain" or for considering dyspareunia a sexual dysfunction. Dyspareunia fits the current DSM-IV-TR classification criteria for pain disorder better than it fits those for sexual dysfunction. Empirical data from diagnostic, experimental, and therapy outcome studies support this conclusion. The reconceptualization of dyspareunia as a pain disorder rather than as a sexual dysfunction has important implications for the understanding and treatment of this prevalent but neglected women's health problem.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版,修订版》(美国精神病学协会,2000年)将性交疼痛归类为性功能障碍,并将其描述为一种“性疼痛”障碍。尽管缺乏理论依据或实证数据支持,但这一分类已被广泛接受且争议不大。对这一分类有效性的审视表明,目前几乎没有理由使用“性疼痛”这一术语,或将性交疼痛视为性功能障碍。性交疼痛更符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版,修订版》目前对疼痛障碍的分类标准,而非性功能障碍的分类标准。来自诊断、实验和治疗结果研究的实证数据支持这一结论。将性交疼痛重新概念化为一种疼痛障碍而非性功能障碍,对于理解和治疗这一普遍但被忽视的女性健康问题具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验