Binik Yitzchak M
Department of Psychology, McGill University, and Sex and Couple Therapy Service, McGill University Health Center (RVH), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Arch Sex Behav. 2005 Feb;34(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-0998-4.
The DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) classifies dyspareunia as a sexual dysfunction and describes it as a "sexual pain" disorder. This classification has been widely accepted with little controversy despite the absence of a theoretical rationale or supporting empirical data. An examination of the validity of this classification suggests that there is little current justification for the use of the term "sexual pain" or for considering dyspareunia a sexual dysfunction. Dyspareunia fits the current DSM-IV-TR classification criteria for pain disorder better than it fits those for sexual dysfunction. Empirical data from diagnostic, experimental, and therapy outcome studies support this conclusion. The reconceptualization of dyspareunia as a pain disorder rather than as a sexual dysfunction has important implications for the understanding and treatment of this prevalent but neglected women's health problem.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版,修订版》(美国精神病学协会,2000年)将性交疼痛归类为性功能障碍,并将其描述为一种“性疼痛”障碍。尽管缺乏理论依据或实证数据支持,但这一分类已被广泛接受且争议不大。对这一分类有效性的审视表明,目前几乎没有理由使用“性疼痛”这一术语,或将性交疼痛视为性功能障碍。性交疼痛更符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版,修订版》目前对疼痛障碍的分类标准,而非性功能障碍的分类标准。来自诊断、实验和治疗结果研究的实证数据支持这一结论。将性交疼痛重新概念化为一种疼痛障碍而非性功能障碍,对于理解和治疗这一普遍但被忽视的女性健康问题具有重要意义。