Suppr超能文献

环孢素普通制剂:问题多于答案。

Generic cyclosporine formulations: more open questions than answers.

作者信息

Cattaneo Dario, Perico Norberto, Remuzzi Giuseppe

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Transplantation, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Italy.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 2005 Apr;18(4):371-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00078.x.

Abstract

The introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) in clinical practice has significantly improved patient and allograft survival after organ transplantation. The new microemulsion CsA formulation, Neoral, has been associated with a more reproducible absorption and a better patient outcome as compared to the old formulation Sandimmune. Recently, several generic CsA formulations have been tested as bioequivalent to Neoral. Bioequivalence tests have been performed in selected groups of young, healthy male volunteers usually in single-dose studies, and then extended to completely different population, such as transplant recipients. However, growing body of evidence shows that CsA pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects is different from that of transplant patients, treated chronically with CsA. Therefore, converting patients from Neoral to the new generic formulations could be detrimental, exposing patients to increased risk of graft function deterioration and graft loss. Thus, more research and more accurate bioequivalence tests are required to address the unanswered problems dealing with the generic CsA formulations.

摘要

环孢素(CsA)应用于临床实践后,显著提高了器官移植患者的生存率及移植物的存活时间。新型微乳环孢素制剂Neoral,与旧制剂山地明相比,吸收更具可重复性,患者预后更佳。近期,有几种环孢素仿制药经测试被认定与Neoral生物等效。生物等效性试验通常在选定的年轻健康男性志愿者群体中进行单剂量研究,随后扩展至完全不同的人群,如移植受者。然而,越来越多的证据表明,健康受试者体内环孢素的药代动力学与长期接受环孢素治疗的移植患者不同。因此,将患者从Neoral转换为新的仿制药制剂可能有害,会使患者面临移植功能恶化和移植物丧失风险增加的问题。因此,需要开展更多研究和更精确的生物等效性试验,以解决与环孢素仿制药制剂相关的未决问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验