Poplin Elizabeth A, Benedetti Jacqueline K, Estes Norman C, Haller Daniel G, Mayer Robert J, Goldberg Richard M, Weiss Geoffrey R, Rivkin Saul E, Macdonald John S
Operations Office, 14980 Omicron Dr, San Antonio, TX 78245-3217, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):1819-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.169.
PURPOSE: Modest toxicity and possibly enhanced activity makes continuous-infusion fluorouracil (FU) an attractive alternative to FU plus leucovorin (FU/LV) for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. Intergroup trial 0153 (Southwest Oncology Group trial 9415) was developed to compare the efficacy of continuous-infusion FU (CIFU) plus levamisole to FU/LV plus levamisole in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk Dukes' B2 and C1 or C2 colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to CIFU 250 mg/m(2)/d for 56 days every 9 weeks for three cycles or FU 425 mg/m(2) and LV 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days every 28 to 35 days for six cycles. All patients received levamisole 50 mg tid for 3 days every other week. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study closed in December 1999 after an interim analysis demonstrated little likelihood of CIFU showing superiority to FU/LV within the stipulated hazard ratio. A total of 1,135 patients were registered. At least one grade 4 toxicity occurred in 39% of patients receiving FU/LV and 5% of patients receiving CIFU. However, almost twice as many patients receiving CIFU discontinued therapy early compared with those receiving FU/LV. The 5-year OS is 70% (95% CI, 66% to 74%) for FU/LV and 69% (95% CI, 64% to 73%) for CIFU. The corresponding 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) is 61% (95% CI, 56% to 65%) and 63% (95% CI, 59% to 68%), respectively. For all patients, 5-year OS is 83%, 74%, and 55%; 5-year DFS is 78%, 67%, and 47% for N0, N1, and N2-3, respectively. CONCLUSION: CIFU had less severe toxicity but did not improve DFS or OS in comparison with bolus FU/LV.
目的:氟尿嘧啶(FU)持续静脉输注毒性较低且可能具有更强的活性,这使其成为结直肠癌辅助治疗中FU加亚叶酸钙(FU/LV)方案颇具吸引力的替代方案。开展了组间试验0153(西南肿瘤协作组试验9415),以比较FU持续静脉输注(CIFU)加左旋咪唑与FU/LV加左旋咪唑在高危Dukes B2和C1或C2期结肠癌辅助治疗中的疗效。 患者与方法:术后,患者被随机分配至每9周接受CIFU 250 mg/m²/d共56天,进行三个周期;或每28至35天接受FU 425 mg/m²及LV 20 mg/m²每日一次共5天,进行六个周期。所有患者每隔一周接受左旋咪唑50 mg每日三次共3天。主要终点为总生存期(OS)。 结果:在一项中期分析显示CIFU在规定风险比范围内显示出优于FU/LV的可能性很小之后,该研究于1999年12月结束。共登记了1135例患者。接受FU/LV的患者中有39%发生至少一次4级毒性反应,接受CIFU的患者中有5%发生。然而,与接受FU/LV的患者相比,接受CIFU的患者提前终止治疗的人数几乎是其两倍。FU/LV组的5年总生存率为70%(95%CI,66%至74%),CIFU组为69%(95%CI,64%至73%)。相应的5年无病生存率(DFS)分别为61%(95%CI,56%至65%)和63%(95%CI,59%至68%)。对于所有患者,N0、N1和N2 - 3期的5年总生存率分别为83%、74%和55%;5年无病生存率分别为78%、67%和47%。 结论:与大剂量FU/LV相比,CIFU毒性较轻,但未改善无病生存率或总生存期。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020-8-15
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2015-9