Kroon Annemarie, Veenendaal René L, Egas Martijn, Bruin Jan, Sabelis Maurice W
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Section Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 320, 1098 SM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Exp Appl Acarol. 2005;35(1-2):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s10493-004-1980-x.
We recently reported evidence for increased diapause incidence in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae in presence of the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri. This effect may arise from (1) selective predation on non-diapause spider mites, (2) predator-induced diapause in spider mites, or (3) both. Using a different strain of T. urticae, we first recovered increased diapause incidence in association with predators. Then, we tested for selective feeding in two-choice experiments with equal numbers of non-diapause and diapause spider mites. We found that the predatory mite had a significant preference for the latter. This indicates that increased diapause incidence in association with predatory mites is not due to selective predation. Therefore, predator-mediated physiological induction of diapause seems a more likely explanation. The cues leading to induction appear to relate to the predators, not their effects, since predation simulated by spider-mite removal or puncturing did not significantly affect diapause incidence. Why spider mites benefit from this response, remains an open question.
我们最近报告了证据,表明在存在捕食螨盲走螨的情况下,二斑叶螨的滞育发生率增加。这种效应可能源于:(1)对非滞育二斑叶螨的选择性捕食;(2)捕食者诱导二斑叶螨进入滞育;或(3)两者皆有。使用不同品系的二斑叶螨,我们首先发现与捕食者相关联时滞育发生率增加。然后,我们在有等量非滞育和滞育二斑叶螨的双选实验中测试了选择性取食情况。我们发现捕食螨对后者有显著偏好。这表明与捕食螨相关联时滞育发生率的增加并非由于选择性捕食。因此,捕食者介导的滞育生理诱导似乎是更有可能的解释。导致诱导的线索似乎与捕食者有关,而非其影响,因为通过去除或穿刺二斑叶螨模拟的捕食并未显著影响滞育发生率。二斑叶螨为何从这种反应中受益,仍是一个悬而未决的问题。