Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术中使用含与不含舒芬太尼的1%硬膜外罗哌卡因。

Epidural ropivacaine 1% with and without sufentanil addition for Caesarean section.

作者信息

Bachmann-Mennenga B, Veit G, Biscoping J, Steinicke B, Heesen M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Klinikum Minden, Minden, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Apr;49(4):525-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00580.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

So far only ropivacaine concentrations of 0.5 and 0.75% have been used for Caesarean section. This prospective double-blind trial evaluated the anaesthetic quality of ropivacaine 1% with and without sufentanil addition.

METHODS

Three groups of patients (n=20 each) scheduled for an elective Caesarean section were studied. The patients received initially 120 mg ropivacaine, or 120 mg ropivacaine plus 10 microg or 20 microg sufentanil. Additional epidural ropivacaine was injected if necessary. Primary outcome parameter was time to achieve sensory block at T4. Moreover, pain intensity at delivery (visual analogue scale, VAS), incidence of maternal side-effects (hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, shivering, pruritus), and neonatal outcome (Apgar score, neurologic and adaptive capacity score, umbilical cord blood-gas values) were recorded.

RESULTS

The onset time for the sensory block was not significantly different among the groups. Also, VAS scores at delivery did not differ significantly between the plain ropivacaine 1% group (18 +/- 29 mm), the 10-microg sufentanil group (1 +/- 5 mm), and the 20-microg sufentanil group (6 +/- 18 mm). The total dose of ropivacaine was significantly higher in the plain ropivacaine 1% group (145 +/- 19 mg) compared to the patients receiving additional 10 microg sufentanil (130 +/- 15 mg, P = 0.02) or 20 microg sufentanil (129 +/- 16 mg, P = 0.01). The incidence of maternal side-effects and neonatal outcome were similar in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Ropivacaine 1% alone provided sufficient analgesia. Sufentanil addition did not significantly improve the quality of epidural anaesthesia with ropivacaine 1.0% for Caesarean section.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,剖宫产仅使用过浓度为0.5%和0.75%的罗哌卡因。这项前瞻性双盲试验评估了添加和不添加舒芬太尼的1%罗哌卡因的麻醉质量。

方法

对三组计划进行择期剖宫产的患者(每组n = 20)进行研究。患者最初接受120 mg罗哌卡因,或120 mg罗哌卡因加10 μg或20 μg舒芬太尼。必要时追加硬膜外罗哌卡因。主要结局参数是达到T4感觉阻滞的时间。此外,记录分娩时的疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分法,VAS)、产妇副作用(低血压、心动过缓、恶心、呕吐、寒战、瘙痒)的发生率以及新生儿结局(阿氏评分、神经和适应能力评分、脐血血气值)。

结果

各组之间感觉阻滞的起效时间无显著差异。同样,1%罗哌卡因单纯组(18±29 mm)、10 μg舒芬太尼组(1±5 mm)和20 μg舒芬太尼组(6±18 mm)分娩时的VAS评分也无显著差异。与接受额外10 μg舒芬太尼(130±15 mg,P = 0.02)或20 μg舒芬太尼(129±16 mg,P = 0.01)的患者相比,1%罗哌卡因单纯组罗哌卡因的总剂量显著更高(145±19 mg)。所有组中产妇副作用的发生率和新生儿结局相似。

结论

单独使用1%罗哌卡因可提供足够的镇痛效果。添加舒芬太尼并未显著改善剖宫产时1.0%罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验