Borak Jonathan
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Conn Med. 2005 Feb;69(2):73-7.
Concerns have been raised about the adequacy of iodine nutrition in the United States despite recent NHANES III data indicating that iodine intake remains generally adequate. Such concerns probably reflect misunderstanding of definitions of iodine deficiency. We review current criteria for iodine deficiency, the reasons for variability of urine iodine determinations, and their relation to interpretations of NHANES data. Although NHANES data indicate that iodine nutrition in the United States is adequate, the possibility remains that those who adhere to restricted diets may have reduced intake of iodine. Because of such possibilities, patients' diets and use of dietary supplements should be explicitly considered as a part of routine medical care.
尽管最近的美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)III数据表明碘摄入量总体上仍然充足,但人们对美国碘营养的充足性仍表示担忧。此类担忧可能反映出对碘缺乏定义的误解。我们回顾了当前碘缺乏的标准、尿碘测定结果变异性的原因及其与NHANES数据解读的关系。虽然NHANES数据表明美国的碘营养充足,但坚持受限饮食的人群仍有可能减少碘摄入量。鉴于存在此类可能性,应明确将患者的饮食和膳食补充剂的使用视为常规医疗护理的一部分。