Cho Dong-Yoon
Hakmoon Surgical Clinic, Gwangju, Korea.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):1037-41. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0867-6.
This study assessed the usefulness of "controlled" lateral sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures.
Of 225 patients with chronic anal fissure, 110 underwent traditional sphincterotomy to the level of the dentate line, and 115 underwent controlled sphincterotomy in three steps according to the degree of anal stenosis. In Step 1, the internal sphincter was divided to the proximal level of the fissure. If the anal canal was still stenosed, the division was extended to the level of the dentate line in Step 2. Step 3 was a bilateral internal sphincterotomy. The anal stenosis was evaluated under anesthesia using a new conical calibrator scaled in 1-mm diameter increments. Forty adults without anorectal disease were examined as controls. In a telephone follow-up, 102 patients in the traditional sphincterotomy group and 106 patients in the controlled sphincterotomy group responded.
The normal group measured 34.6 +/- 1.4 mm (mean +/- standard deviation). Confounding effects of age, gender, body weight, and height were not significant. Based on the anal caliber measured in the normal group, anal stenosis is present with values of 31 mm and below (mean--2SD of the control value). Of 115 patients in the controlled sphincterotomy group, 90 (78 percent) underwent sphincterotomy below the level of the dentate line, 18 (16 percent) underwent sphincterotomy to the level of the dentate line, and 7 (6 percent) underwent bilateral sphincterotomy. None had incontinence of feces or leakage of stool. Ten of 102 patients (10 percent) in the traditional sphincterotomy group and 2 of 106 patients (2 percent) in the controlled sphincterotomy group complained of minor incontinence, such as gas incontinence, minor staining, or urgency (P = 0.017). There was one recurrence in the traditional sphincterotomy group.
Controlled lateral sphincterotomy could be a way of overcoming the risk of incontinence with lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure.
本研究评估“控制性”侧方括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的有效性。
225例慢性肛裂患者中,110例行传统括约肌切开至齿状线水平,115例根据肛门狭窄程度分三步进行控制性括约肌切开术。第一步,将内括约肌切断至肛裂近端水平。若肛管仍狭窄,则在第二步将切断范围扩展至齿状线水平。第三步为双侧内括约肌切开术。在麻醉状态下使用一种新型直径以1毫米递增的锥形校准器评估肛门狭窄情况。40例无肛肠疾病的成年人作为对照。通过电话随访,传统括约肌切开术组102例患者和控制性括约肌切开术组106例患者作出回应。
正常组测量值为34.6±1.4毫米(均值±标准差)。年龄、性别、体重和身高的混杂效应不显著。根据正常组测量的肛门口径,肛门狭窄的诊断标准为31毫米及以下(均值 - 对照值的2个标准差)。在控制性括约肌切开术组的115例患者中,90例(78%)的括约肌切开在齿状线以下水平,18例(16%)的括约肌切开至齿状线水平,7例(6%)行双侧括约肌切开术。无一例出现大便失禁或粪便渗漏。传统括约肌切开术组102例患者中有10例(10%)、控制性括约肌切开术组106例患者中有2例(2%)主诉有轻微失禁,如气体失禁、轻微污粪或便急(P = 0.017)。传统括约肌切开术组有1例复发。
控制性侧方括约肌切开术可能是一种克服慢性肛裂行侧方内括约肌切开术所致失禁风险的方法。