Suppr超能文献

颞部扫描仪测温法:一种用于估计重症监护病房患者核心体温的新方法。

Temporal scanner thermometry: a new method of core temperature estimation in ICU patients.

作者信息

Myny D, De Waele J, Defloor T, Blot S, Colardyn F

机构信息

Department of intensive care, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Scott Med J. 2005 Feb;50(1):15-8. doi: 10.1177/003693300505000106.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Temperature measurement is a routine task of patient care, with considerable clinical impact, especially in the ICU. This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy and variability of the Temporal Artery Thermometer (TAT) in ICU-patients. Therefore, a convenience sample of 57 adult patients, with indwelling pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) in a 40-bed intensive care unit in a university teaching hospital was used.

METHODS

The study design was a prospective, descriptive comparative analysis. Body temperature was thereby measured simultaneously with the TAT and the Axillary Thermometer (AT), and was compared with the temperature recording of the PAC. The use of vasoactive medication was recorded.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Mean temperature of all measurements was: PAC: 37.1 degrees C (SD: 0.87), TAT 37.0 degrees C (SD: 0.68) and axillary thermometer: 36.6 degrees C (SD: 0.94). The measurements of the TAT and the PAC were not significantly different (man differnce: 0.14 degrees C; SD: 0.51; p = 0.33); whereas the measurements of the PAC and the AT differed significantly (mean difference: 0.46 degerees C; SD: 0.39; p < 0.001). Mean diference in PAC versus TAT analyses, between patients with vasopressor therapy (0.12 degrees C; SD: 0.55), and without vasopressor therapy (0.19 degrees C; SD: 0.48) was not statistically significant (p = 0.47).

CONCLUSION

We can conclude that the temporal scanner has a relatively good reliability with an acceptable accuracy and variability in patients with normothermia. The results are comparable to those of the AT, but they do not seem to be sufficient to prove any substantial benefit compared to rectal, oral or bladder thermometry.

摘要

背景与目的

体温测量是患者护理的一项常规工作,具有重要的临床意义,尤其是在重症监护病房(ICU)。本研究旨在评估颞动脉体温计(TAT)在ICU患者中的准确性和变异性。因此,选取了一所大学教学医院中40张床位的重症监护病房里57例留置肺动脉导管(PAC)的成年患者作为便利样本。

方法

本研究设计为前瞻性描述性对比分析。通过TAT和腋温计(AT)同时测量体温,并与PAC记录的温度进行比较。记录血管活性药物的使用情况。

结果与结论

所有测量的平均体温为:PAC:37.1摄氏度(标准差:0.87),TAT:37.0摄氏度(标准差:0.68),腋温计:36.6摄氏度(标准差:0.94)。TAT和PAC的测量结果无显著差异(平均差异:0.14摄氏度;标准差:0.51;p = 0.33);而PAC和AT的测量结果差异显著(平均差异:0.46摄氏度;标准差:0.39;p < 0.001)。在接受血管升压药治疗的患者(0.12摄氏度;标准差:0.55)和未接受血管升压药治疗的患者(0.19摄氏度;标准差:0.48)中,PAC与TAT分析的平均差异无统计学意义(p = 0.47)。

结论

我们可以得出结论,颞动脉体温计在体温正常的患者中具有相对较好的可靠性,准确性和变异性均可接受。结果与腋温计相当,但与直肠、口腔或膀胱测温相比,似乎不足以证明有任何实质性优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验