Suppr超能文献

社会性一夫一妻制雀形目鸟类中配偶外交配行为的演变:雌性配偶外交配行为的直接和间接选择强度

The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females.

作者信息

Arnqvist Göran, Kirkpatrick Mark

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolution, Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, University of Uppsala, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Am Nat. 2005 May;165 Suppl 5:S26-37. doi: 10.1086/429350.

Abstract

Many studies have been aimed at understanding the maintenance of female infidelity in socially monogamous birds. Because engaging in extrapair copulations (EPCs) is believed to be costly for females, it has been argued that EPC behavior must bring indirect benefits to females by elevating offspring fitness. We use empirical data from the literature to assess the relative strength of indirect and direct selection on female EPC behavior, using quantitative genetic approximations of selection. This analysis confirmed that there is generally negative direct selection on EPC behavior caused by depressed paternal investment by social males. In contrast, there was no significant positive indirect selection on EPC behavior in females. A comparison between the two types of selection suggests that the force of direct negative selection is generally much stronger than that of indirect positive selection. Indirect selection is thus unlikely to maintain EPC behavior in the face of direct selection against it. We suggest that EPCs may instead be the result of antagonistic selection on loci influencing the outcome of male-female encounters and that EPC behavior per se may not be adaptive for females but may reflect sexual conflict due to strong selection in males to achieve extrapair copulations.

摘要

许多研究旨在了解社会一夫一妻制鸟类中雌性不忠行为的维持机制。由于参与婚外交配(EPCs)被认为对雌性来说成本高昂,因此有人认为EPC行为必定通过提高后代的适应性给雌性带来间接益处。我们利用文献中的实证数据,通过选择的数量遗传学近似值来评估对雌性EPC行为的间接选择和直接选择的相对强度。该分析证实,社会雄性的父本投资减少通常会对EPC行为产生负面的直接选择。相比之下,对雌性EPC行为没有显著的正向间接选择。两种选择类型之间的比较表明,直接负面选择的力量通常比间接正向选择的力量要强得多。因此,面对针对它的直接选择,间接选择不太可能维持EPC行为。我们认为,EPCs可能相反是对影响雌雄相遇结果的基因座进行对抗性选择的结果,并且EPC行为本身可能对雌性并不具有适应性,而是可能反映了由于雄性为实现婚外交配而进行的强烈选择所导致的性冲突。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验