Lewis Rebecca J
Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Oct;128(2):389-98. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20206.
Male and female interests can either be in conflict or serve as a basis for exchange. Communication is thus an important aspect of intersexual relationships. Verreaux's sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi), like many prosimians, uses chemical signals as one form of communication. The goals of this study were to determine 1) if males and females exhibit sex differences in their scent-marking behavior, and 2) if scent-marking is an example of mating conflict or cooperation. All occurrences of scent-marks, scent-mark context, and scent-mark style were collected on 23 sifaka in the Kirindy Forest of western Madagascar for 7 months (September 2001-March 2002). Scent-mark rates were collected using continuous focal animal sampling from November 2000-March 2002. Home-range data were collected using monthly censuses and instantaneous focal sampling throughout those 17 months. The pressures of behavioral ecology seem to have shaped scent-marking in sifaka: the sexes exhibited significantly different scent-marking behavior. Results from this study are consistent with the hypotheses that 1) females scent-mark to advertise their presence and mark their resources, 2) clean-chested males use scent-marks as between-group communication to advertise their presence, and 3) stained-chested males use scent-marks as a form of olfactory mate-guarding. Scent-marking does not appear to be a "service" that males provide to females, because overmarking limits female communication rather than adding to the overall number of scent-marks. Scent-marking behavior is a crucial aspect of the mating conflict and for understanding intersexual relationships in sifaka.
雄性和雌性的兴趣可能相互冲突,也可能成为交流的基础。因此,沟通是两性关系的一个重要方面。像许多原猴亚目动物一样,维氏冕狐猴(Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi)将化学信号作为一种交流方式。本研究的目的是确定:1)雄性和雌性在气味标记行为上是否存在性别差异;2)气味标记是交配冲突还是合作的一个例子。在马达加斯加西部基林迪森林的23只冕狐猴身上,收集了7个月(2001年9月至2002年3月)内所有气味标记的发生情况、气味标记的背景和气味标记的方式。2000年11月至2002年3月,采用连续焦点动物取样法收集气味标记率。在这17个月中,通过每月一次的普查和即时焦点取样收集家域数据。行为生态学的压力似乎塑造了冕狐猴的气味标记行为:两性表现出明显不同的气味标记行为。本研究结果与以下假设一致:1)雌性通过气味标记来表明自己的存在并标记其资源;2)胸部无污渍的雄性将气味标记用作群体间交流以表明自己的存在;3)胸部有污渍的雄性将气味标记用作一种嗅觉配偶保卫形式。气味标记似乎并不是雄性为雌性提供的一种“服务”,因为重叠标记限制了雌性的交流,而不是增加了气味标记的总数。气味标记行为是交配冲突的一个关键方面,对于理解冕狐猴的两性关系至关重要。