Suppr超能文献

患者对急诊科侵犯隐私行为的认知

Patient perceptions of privacy infringements in an emergency department.

作者信息

Karro Jonathan, Dent Andrew W, Farish Stephen

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, St Vincent's Health, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Apr;17(2):117-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00702.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the nature, severity, impact, frequency and risk factors for patient perceived privacy infringements in the ED of St Vincent's Health Melbourne with 32,000 emergency attendances per annum.

METHODS

Patients 18 years and older attending emergency over a 2-week period were offered a nine-item questionnaire using a Likert scale. A privacy incident was defined as: (i) overhearing medical or personal information; (ii) being overheard; (iii) having private body parts exposed or (iv) seeing others' body parts. Differences between demographic, emergency environment, length of stay and other factors suspected of affecting patient privacy were quantified.

RESULTS

From 1169 emergency presentations, 235 patients returned questionnaires, with 105 of these (45%) reporting a total of 159 privacy incidents. Seventy-eight patients (33%, 95% CI 28-36%) reported a definite privacy incident and 81 (35%, 95% CI 29-37%) reported a probable privacy incident. Ninety-six patients (41%, 95% CI 35-47%) reported overhearing other patient's conversations with the staff whereas 36 (15%, 95% CI 11-21%) felt their conversations with staff were overheard by others. Twenty-seven patients (11%, 95% CI 6-14%) experienced or observed inappropriate exposure of private body parts. Ten patients (4%, 95% CI 2-7%) changed or withheld information from staff because they felt others may overhear it and two refused part of their physical examination because they felt they may be seen by inappropriate people. Twenty-four patients (10%, 95% CI 6-14%) did not have their expectations of privacy met. The longer a patient was in emergency the greater the number of privacy incidents they experienced (Spearman correlation P < 0.01). Patients in walled cubicles experienced fewer privacy incidents than those in curtained cubicles (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient privacy incidents occur frequently in an ED, risk factors being length of stay and absence of a walled cubicle. Patients who have their conversations overheard are more likely to withhold information from staff and less likely to have had their expectations of privacy met.

摘要

目的

确定墨尔本圣文森特医院急诊科患者感知到的隐私侵犯的性质、严重程度、影响、发生频率及风险因素,该急诊科每年有32000人次急诊就诊。

方法

为18岁及以上在两周内前来急诊的患者提供一份采用李克特量表的包含九个条目的问卷。隐私事件定义为:(i)无意中听到医疗或个人信息;(ii)被他人无意中听到;(iii)私密身体部位暴露或(iv)看到他人的身体部位。对人口统计学、急诊环境、留观时间及其他疑似影响患者隐私的因素之间的差异进行量化分析。

结果

在1169例急诊就诊患者中,235例患者返回了问卷,其中105例(45%)报告了总共159起隐私事件。78例患者(33%,95%置信区间28 - 36%)报告发生了明确的隐私事件,81例(35%,95%置信区间29 - 37%)报告可能发生了隐私事件。96例患者(41%,95%置信区间35 - 47%)报告无意中听到其他患者与工作人员的对话,而36例(15%,95%置信区间11 - 21%)感觉自己与工作人员的对话被他人无意中听到。27例患者(11%,95%置信区间6 - 14%)经历或观察到私密身体部位的不当暴露。10例患者(4%,95%置信区间2 - 7%)因为感觉他人可能会无意中听到而更改或未向工作人员提供信息,2例患者拒绝部分体格检查,因为他们觉得可能会被不合适的人看到。24例患者(10%,95%置信区间6 - 14%)的隐私期望未得到满足。患者在急诊室停留的时间越长,经历的隐私事件数量就越多(斯皮尔曼相关性P < 0.01)。在有墙壁隔间的患者经历的隐私事件比在有帘子隔间的患者少(P < 0.05)。

结论

在急诊科患者隐私事件频繁发生,风险因素为留观时间和没有墙壁隔间。对话被他人无意中听到的患者更有可能不向工作人员提供信息,且其隐私期望更不易得到满足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验