von Schoultz Eva, Rutqvist Lars E
Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital & Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Apr 6;97(7):533-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji071.
In 1997 two independent randomized clinical trials, Hormonal Replacement Therapy After Breast Cancer--Is It Safe? (HABITS; 434 patients) and the Stockholm trial (378 patients), were initiated in Sweden to compare menopausal hormone therapy with no menopausal hormone therapy after diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer. Much of the design of both studies was similar; however, a goal of the Stockholm protocol, not shared with the HABITS trial, was to minimize the use of progestogen combined with estrogen. The HABITS trial was prematurely stopped in December 2003, because, at a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the risk for recurrence of breast cancer among patients receiving menopausal hormone therapy was statistically significantly higher (relative hazard [RH] = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5 to 7.4) than among those receiving no treatment. In the Stockholm trial, however, at a median follow-up of 4.1 years, the risk of breast cancer recurrence was not associated with menopausal hormone therapy (RH = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.35 to 1.9). Statistically significant heterogeneity in the rate of recurrence was observed (P = .02; two-sided likelihood-ratio test) between the two studies, indicating that chance may not be the only explanation. Doses of estrogen and progestogen and treatment regimens for menopausal hormone therapy may be associated with the recurrence of breast cancer.
1997年,瑞典启动了两项独立的随机临床试验,即“乳腺癌后激素替代疗法——安全吗?”(HABITS;434例患者)和斯德哥尔摩试验(378例患者),以比较早期乳腺癌诊断后绝经激素治疗与非绝经激素治疗的效果。两项研究的设计在很大程度上相似;然而,斯德哥尔摩方案有一个目标(HABITS试验未采用),即尽量减少孕激素与雌激素联合使用。HABITS试验于2003年12月提前终止,因为在中位随访2.1年时,接受绝经激素治疗的患者中乳腺癌复发风险在统计学上显著更高(相对风险[RH]=3.3,95%置信区间[CI]=1.5至7.4),高于未接受治疗的患者。然而,在斯德哥尔摩试验中,中位随访4.1年时,乳腺癌复发风险与绝经激素治疗无关(RH=0.82,95%CI=0.35至1.9)。两项研究之间观察到复发率存在统计学上的显著异质性(P=0.02;双侧似然比检验),这表明偶然性可能不是唯一的解释。雌激素和孕激素的剂量以及绝经激素治疗的方案可能与乳腺癌复发有关。