Suppr超能文献

评估血清转铁蛋白受体浓度在缺铁性贫血与慢性病贫血的诊断及鉴别诊断中的作用。

Evaluation of serum transferrin receptor concentration in diagnosing and differentiating iron deficiency anaemia from anaemia of chronic disorders.

作者信息

Hanif Ejaz, Ayyub Muhammad, Anwar Masood, Ali Waqar, Bashir Mukarram

机构信息

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2005 Jan;55(1):13-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To diagnose and differentiate iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) from anaemia of chronic disorders (ACD) using serum concentration of soluble transferrin receptors (sTfR).

METHODS

One hundred and seventy six adult anaemic patients were diagnosed on bone marrow examination as IDA and ACD in the Department of Haematology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi from November 2001 to May 2003. They were further evaluated with sTfR, serum iron, total iron binding capacity (TIBC) and serum ferritin. These biochemical investigations were compared with results of bone marrow iron status, which served as gold standard. Absence of stainable iron in the bone marrow was diagnostic of iron deficiency, whereas abundance of iron along with decreased siderocytes and sideroblasts was considered diagnostic of ACD. Data was collected on a proforma and analysed using software SPSS (version 11.0) and t-test was used to test the statistical significance. Specificity, sensitivity positive and negative predictive value of the sTfR test was calculated.

RESULTS

Out of 176 patients studied, 90 (51.1%) were diagnosed as ACD whereas 86 (48.8%) as IDA. The mean +/- SD sTfR levels in IDA patients was 9.68 +/- 2.48 mg/I, whereas mean +/- SD sTfR levels in ACD patients was 2.96 +/- 1.28 mg/I, thus clearly separating the two categories of anaemic patients. Both the sensitivity and specificity of sTfR in IDA was found to be 100%, whereas in ACD, these were 66.6% and 100% respectively. The positive and negative predictive value, in case of IDA was 100%, whereas in ACD it was 100% and 74.1% respectively. The results of serum iron, TIBC and serum ferritin correlated well in IDA, with a fall in serum iron, raised TIBC and decreased serum ferritin, except in few cases in which concomitant inflammatory conditions resulted in falsely high serum ferritin level. Serum iron and TIBC were not useful in cases of ACD. However, the serum ferritin cutoff level of 90 ng/ml was evaluated which virtually excludes IDA, and found this highly effective in cases of IDA alongwith chronic inflammatory conditions.

CONCLUSION

The results show that in case of simple IDA, sTfR concentration is significantly raised and it has a very high test efficiency in this condition. However in case of ACD the positive predictive value is high (100%) but the negative predictive value is compromised (74.1%). It is therefore a reliable laboratory index of IDA and in distinguishing IDA from ACD).

摘要

目的

利用可溶性转铁蛋白受体(sTfR)血清浓度诊断缺铁性贫血(IDA)并与慢性病贫血(ACD)相鉴别。

方法

2001年11月至2003年5月期间,在拉瓦尔品第武装部队病理研究所血液科,176例成年贫血患者经骨髓检查确诊为IDA和ACD。对他们进一步进行sTfR、血清铁、总铁结合力(TIBC)和血清铁蛋白评估。将这些生化检查结果与作为金标准的骨髓铁状态结果进行比较。骨髓中无可染色铁可诊断为缺铁,而铁丰富同时含铁血红细胞和有核红细胞减少则被认为可诊断为ACD。数据通过表格收集,并使用SPSS软件(版本11.0)进行分析,采用t检验来检验统计学意义。计算sTfR检测的特异性、敏感性、阳性和阴性预测值。

结果

在研究的176例患者中,90例(51.1%)被诊断为ACD,而86例(48.8%)为IDA。IDA患者的平均±标准差sTfR水平为9.68±2.48mg/I,而ACD患者的平均±标准差sTfR水平为2.96±1.28mg/I,从而清晰地区分了两类贫血患者。sTfR在IDA中的敏感性和特异性均为100%,而在ACD中,敏感性和特异性分别为66.6%和100%。IDA的阳性和阴性预测值均为100%,而ACD的阳性和阴性预测值分别为100%和74.1%。血清铁、TIBC和血清铁蛋白的结果在IDA中相关性良好,表现为血清铁降低、TIBC升高和血清铁蛋白降低,但少数伴有炎症的病例中血清铁蛋白水平会假性升高。血清铁和TIBC在ACD病例中无诊断价值。然而评估了血清铁蛋白临界值90ng/ml,该值几乎可排除IDA,发现在伴有慢性炎症的IDA病例中非常有效。

结论

结果表明,在单纯IDA病例中,sTfR浓度显著升高,在此情况下其检测效率非常高。然而在ACD病例中,阳性预测值高(100%)但阴性预测值受到影响(74.1%)。因此,它是IDA的可靠实验室指标,可用于区分IDA和ACD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验