Choe Hae Mi, Mitrovich Sonya, Dubay Daniel, Hayward Rodney A, Krein Sarah L, Vijan Sandeep
College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Apr;11(4):253-60.
To evaluate the effect of case management by a clinical pharmacist on glycemic control and preventive measures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Randomized controlled trial in a university-affiliated primary care internal medicine clinic.
We recruited 80 patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. A clinical pharmacist provided evaluation and modification of pharmacotherapy, self-management diabetes education, and reinforcement of diabetes complications screening processes through clinic visits and telephone follow-up. The main clinical outcome was hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) level; process measures included HbA1C and low-density lipoprotein measurement, retinal examination, urine microalbumin testing (or use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), and monofilament screening for diabetic neuropathy.
Patients in the intervention and control groups were similar in age, sex, mean HbA1C levels (10.1% and 10.2%, respectively; P = .65), and current treatment regimens at baseline. Patients who received case management by the clinical pharmacist achieved greater reduction in HbA1C levels than those in the control group (2.1% vs 0.9%, P = .03). Three of the 5 process measures were conducted more frequently in the intervention group than the control group, including low-density lipoprotein measurement (100.0% vs 85.7%, P = .02), retinal examination (97.3% vs 74.3%), and monofilament foot screening (92.3% vs 62.9%).
Proactive diabetes case management by a pharmacist substantially improved glycemic control and diabetes process-of-care measures. This approach, integrated with and based in the primary care setting, was an effective and efficient approach to improving care, especially for those with poor glycemic control at baseline.
评估临床药师进行病例管理对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制及预防措施的效果。
在一所大学附属医院的基层医疗内科诊所进行随机对照试验。
我们招募了80例血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者。一名临床药师通过门诊就诊和电话随访,对药物治疗进行评估和调整,开展糖尿病自我管理教育,并加强糖尿病并发症筛查流程。主要临床结局为糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)水平;过程指标包括HbA1C和低密度脂蛋白测定、视网膜检查、尿微量白蛋白检测(或使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂)以及糖尿病神经病变的单丝筛查。
干预组和对照组患者在年龄、性别、基线时的平均HbA1C水平(分别为10.1%和10.2%;P = 0.65)以及当前治疗方案方面相似。接受临床药师病例管理的患者HbA1C水平降低幅度大于对照组(2.1%对0.9%,P = 0.03)。干预组5项过程指标中的3项比对照组开展得更频繁,包括低密度脂蛋白测定(100.0%对85.7%,P = 0.02)、视网膜检查(97.3%对74.3%)以及单丝足部筛查(92.3%对62.9%)。
药师积极主动的糖尿病病例管理显著改善了血糖控制及糖尿病诊疗过程指标。这种方法融入基层医疗环境并以其为基础,是改善医疗服务的一种有效且高效的途径,尤其对于基线血糖控制不佳的患者。