Akbari Ayub, Lepage Nathalie, Keely Erin, Clark Heather D, Jaffey James, MacKinnon Martin, Filler Guido
Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
BJOG. 2005 May;112(5):575-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00492.x.
To assess the validity of Cystatin-C (Cys-C) and beta trace protein (BTP) as clinical markers of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in pregnant women.
Prospective cross sectional study.
Obstetric unit of a tertiary care hospital.
One hundred and thirty-seven normal pregnant women and 13 women postpartum.
Twenty-four hour creatinine clearance (CrCl), serum creatinine, Cys-C and BTP concentrations were measured on normal pregnant women in the first trimester (n= 5), second trimester (n= 68) and third trimester (n= 64) and in 13 women postpartum. Data are given as median (2.5th centile, 97.5th centile).
Serum concentrations of Cys-C and BTP compared with creatinine clearance and serum creatinine.
The median serum creatinine throughout gestation was 53 micromol/L (39, 71), and median CrCl was 143 mL/minute (91 to 216). Postpartum, creatinine rose to 74 micromol/L (58, 86) and CrCl decreased to 104 mL/minute (71, 159). For Cys-C, the median concentration was 0.70 mg/L (0.46, 1.32), and 0.54 mg/L (0.36, 0.96) for BTP. Comparing the second and third trimesters, there was no significant difference between CrCl (median 145 vs 141 mL/minute) and BTP concentrations (median 0.51 vs 0.55 mg/L), while median Cys-C was significantly higher in the third trimester (0.61 vs 0.88 mg/L; P < 0.001). Unlike creatinine and BTP, Cys-C levels decreased to 0.72 mg/L (0.57, 0.95) postpartum. The only significant relationship of either of these markers to the standard used for GFR was between Cys-C and CrCl in the third trimester, and the correlation was weak (r= 0.27 for 1/Cys-C vs CrCl).
These data demonstrate that despite claims to the contrary, Cys-C is a poor marker of GFR during pregnancy. Similarly, BTP shows little promise.
评估胱抑素C(Cys-C)和β-微球蛋白(BTP)作为孕妇肾小球滤过率(GFR)临床标志物的有效性。
前瞻性横断面研究。
一家三级护理医院的产科病房。
137名正常孕妇和13名产后妇女。
测定了孕早期(n = 5)、孕中期(n = 68)、孕晚期(n = 64)的137名正常孕妇以及13名产后妇女的24小时肌酐清除率(CrCl)、血清肌酐、Cys-C和BTP浓度。数据以中位数(第2.5百分位数,第97.5百分位数)表示。
比较Cys-C和BTP的血清浓度与肌酐清除率及血清肌酐的关系。
整个孕期血清肌酐中位数为53μmol/L(39,71),肌酐清除率中位数为143 mL/分钟(91至216)。产后,肌酐升至74μmol/L(58,86),肌酐清除率降至104 mL/分钟(71,159)。Cys-C的中位数浓度为0.70mg/L(0.46, 1.32),BTP为0.54mg/L(0.36, 0.96)。比较孕中期和孕晚期,肌酐清除率(中位数145对141 mL/分钟)和BTP浓度(中位数0.51对0.55mg/L)之间无显著差异,但孕晚期Cys-C中位数显著更高(0.61对0.88mg/L;P < 0.001)。与肌酐和BTP不同,产后Cys-C水平降至0.72mg/L(0.57, 0.95)。这些标志物与GFR标准之间唯一显著的关系是孕晚期Cys-C与肌酐清除率之间的关系,且相关性较弱(1/Cys-C与肌酐清除率的r = 0.27)。
这些数据表明,尽管有相反的说法,但Cys-C在孕期并不是GFR的良好标志物。同样,BTP也没有太大前景。