Caissie Rachel, Campbell Melanie McNutt, Frenette Wendy L, Scott Lori, Howell Illona, Roy Anouk
School of Human Communication Disorders, Dalhousie University, 5599 Fenwick St., Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Mar;16(3):157-71. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.3.4.
Spouses of persons with hearing loss served as talkers to examine the benefits of clear speech intervention. One talker received intervention on clear speech. A second talker was simply instructed to speak clearly. Each talker was recorded reading sentences in three conditions: conversational speech, clear speech one week postintervention, and clear speech one month postintervention. Speech acoustic measures were obtained. Then the sentences were presented to subjects with normal hearing and subjects with hearing loss to measure speech recognition. Results showed that simply asking a talker to speak clearly was effective in eliciting clear speech; however, providing intervention yielded changes in more speech parameters, more stable changes, and better speech recognition. When listening to the talker who received intervention, subjects with hearing loss achieved the same performance as subjects with normal hearing. However, they performed worse than subjects with normal hearing when listening to the talker who received clear speech instructions only. Individuals with hearing loss would receive speech recognition benefits if their partners were provided with clear speech intervention.
听力损失者的配偶作为说话者,以检验清晰言语干预的益处。一位说话者接受了清晰言语干预。另一位说话者仅被指示要清楚地说话。每位说话者在三种情况下朗读句子并被录音:对话言语、干预后一周的清晰言语、干预后一个月的清晰言语。获取了语音声学测量数据。然后将这些句子呈现给听力正常的受试者和听力损失的受试者,以测量言语识别。结果表明,仅仅要求说话者清楚地说话就能有效地引出清晰言语;然而,提供干预会在更多语音参数上产生变化、变化更稳定且言语识别更好。当听接受干预的说话者讲话时,听力损失的受试者表现与听力正常的受试者相同。然而,当听仅接受清晰言语指示的说话者讲话时,他们的表现比听力正常的受试者差。如果为听力损失者的伴侣提供清晰言语干预,听力损失者将获得言语识别方面的益处。