Smith C A, Hay P P J
School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5001.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD004046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004046.pub2.
There is interest from the community in the use of self help and complementary therapies for depression. This review examined the currently available evidence supporting the use of acupuncture to treat depression.
To examine the efficacy and adverse effects of acupuncture for depression.
The following databases were searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) MEDLINE (1966 to Sept 2003) EMBASE (1980 to Sept 2003) PSYCINFO (1874 to Sept 2003) the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) CISCOM, CINAHL (January 1980 to Sept 2003). The following terms were used: depression, depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder and acupuncture.
Inclusion criteria included all published and unpublished randomised controlled trials comparing acupuncture with sham acupuncture, no treatment, pharmacological treatment, other structured psychotherapies (cognitive behavioural therapy, psychotherapy or counselling), or standard care. The following modes of treatment were included: acupuncture, electro acupuncture or laser acupuncture. The subjects included adult men and women with depression defined by clinical state description, or diagnosed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV), Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), or the International Classification of Disease (ICD).
Meta analysis was performed using relative risk for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals. Primary outcomes were reduction in the severity of depression, measured by self rating scales, or by clinician rated scales; and an improvement in depression defined as remission vs no remission.
Seven trials comprising 517 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Five trials (409 subjects) included a comparison between acupuncture and medication. Two other trials compared acupuncture with a wait list control or sham acupuncture. Subjects generally had mild to moderate depression. There was no evidence that medication was better than acupuncture in reducing the severity of depression (WMD 0.53, 95%CI -1.42 to 2.47), or in improving depression, defined as remission versus no remission (RR1.2, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.51).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to determine the efficacy of acupuncture compared to medication, or to wait list control or sham acupuncture, in the management of depression. Scientific study design was poor and the number of people studied was small.
社区对使用自助和辅助疗法治疗抑郁症存在兴趣。本综述研究了目前支持使用针灸治疗抑郁症的现有证据。
研究针灸治疗抑郁症的疗效和不良反应。
检索了以下数据库:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE,1966年至2003年9月)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE,1980年至2003年9月)、心理学文摘数据库(PSYCINFO,1874年至2003年9月)、循证医学数据库(DARE)、补充与替代医学数据库(CISCOM)、护理学与健康照护数据库(CINAHL,1980年1月至2003年9月)。使用了以下检索词:抑郁症、抑郁障碍、心境恶劣障碍和针灸。
入选标准包括所有已发表和未发表的随机对照试验,这些试验比较了针灸与假针灸、不治疗、药物治疗、其他结构化心理治疗(认知行为疗法、心理治疗或咨询)或标准护理。包括以下治疗方式:针灸、电针或激光针灸。受试者包括根据临床状态描述定义为患有抑郁症,或根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV)、研究诊断标准(RDC)或国际疾病分类(ICD)诊断为抑郁症的成年男性和女性。
采用相对危险度分析二分变量结局,采用加权均数差值分析连续变量结局,并计算95%可信区间。主要结局为通过自评量表或临床医生评定量表测量的抑郁严重程度降低;以及将抑郁症改善定义为缓解与未缓解。
7项试验共517名受试者符合入选标准。5项试验(409名受试者)比较了针灸与药物治疗。另外2项试验将针灸与等待名单对照或假针灸进行了比较。受试者一般患有轻度至中度抑郁症。没有证据表明在降低抑郁严重程度方面(加权均数差值0.53,95%可信区间-1.42至2.47)或在改善抑郁症方面(定义为缓解与未缓解,相对危险度1.2,95%可信区间0.94至1.51)药物治疗优于针灸。
在抑郁症管理方面,与药物治疗、等待名单对照或假针灸相比,没有足够证据确定针灸的疗效。科学研究设计不佳,研究人数较少。