Luger Thomas J, Farkas Wolfgang, Geisler Hans, Lorenz Ingo H
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, 6620 Innsbruck, Austria.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005 May;96(5):366-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_05.x.
This paper investigates the possible antinociceptive effect of systemically administered ciprofloxacin and gentamicin and its influence on intrathecal morphine-induced antinociception. Using thermal nociceptive tests (hot-plate test and tail-flick test) and a motor function test (catalepsy test) in male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=5-9/dose), the following observations were made: ciprofloxacin administered intraperitoneally in the dose range 4-64 mg/kg demonstrated a modest antinociceptive effect in both nociceptive tests. Solvent of ciprofloxacin (intraperitoneally) and saline (intraperitoneally), given as a control, showed no effect. Gentamicin, administered at a dose of 0.1-4 mg/kg intraperitoneally, demonstrated a significant (P<0.05) antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick test but not in the hot-plate test. However, opioid antagonists caused no significant change in the antibiotics. Furthermore, ciprofloxacin intraperitoneally produced a significant left-shift in the hot-plate test (ED50 saline-morphine=2.86 [CI 95%: 2.2, 4.32]microg; ED50 ciprofloxacin-morphine=0.87 (CI 95% 0.68, 1.21) microg, P<0.05) and in the tail-flick test (ED50 saline-morphine=1.98 (CI 95%: 1.21, 2.84) microg; ED50 ciprofloxacin-morphine=0.37 (CI 95%: 0.23, 0.44) microg; P<0.05) for intrathecal morphine-induced antinociception. From a comparison of these data with the predicted ciprofloxacin-morphine value (hot-plate test: 1.61 (CI 95%: 1.18, 2.51]microg; tail-flick test: 0.82 (CI 95%: 0.52, 1.92) microg) we estimate that ciprofloxacin and morphine produce at least additive effects (P>0.05). This was reversed with intraperitoneal naloxone (P<0.05). Gentamicin intraperitoneally did not influence the antinociception achieved with intrathecal administration of morphine (hot-plate test: ED50 gentamicin-morphine=2.71 (CI 95%: 2.35; 3.2) microg; tail-flick test: ED50 gentamicin-morphine=2.43 (CI 95%: 1.58; 5.22]microg; P>0.05). These data show that intraperitoneal administration of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin produces a modest antinociceptive effect in the hot-plate test and tail-flick test. Ciprofloxacin, but not gentamicin, can interact at least additively to increased naloxone-reversible morphine intrathecal antinociception. Differences in the ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier between the two antibiotics could explain the lack of effect from gentamicin in the hot plate and on morphine-induced antinociception.
本文研究了全身给药环丙沙星和庆大霉素可能的抗伤害感受作用及其对鞘内注射吗啡诱导的抗伤害感受的影响。在雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠(每组剂量n = 5 - 9只)中使用热伤害感受测试(热板试验和甩尾试验)以及运动功能测试(僵住试验),得出以下观察结果:腹腔注射剂量范围为4 - 64mg/kg的环丙沙星在两种伤害感受测试中均表现出适度的抗伤害感受作用。作为对照给予的环丙沙星溶剂(腹腔注射)和生理盐水(腹腔注射)均无作用。腹腔注射剂量为0.1 - 4mg/kg的庆大霉素在甩尾试验中表现出显著(P<0.05)的抗伤害感受作用,但在热板试验中无此作用。然而,阿片类拮抗剂并未使抗生素产生显著变化。此外,腹腔注射环丙沙星在热板试验(生理盐水 - 吗啡的半数有效量ED50 = 2.86 [95%置信区间:2.2, 4.32]μg;环丙沙星 - 吗啡的半数有效量ED50 = 0.87(95%置信区间0.68, 1.21)μg,P<0.05)和甩尾试验(生理盐水 - 吗啡的半数有效量ED50 = 1.98(95%置信区间:1.21, 2.84)μg;环丙沙星 - 吗啡的半数有效量ED50 = 0.37(95%置信区间:0.23, 0.44)μg;P<0.05)中,使鞘内注射吗啡诱导的抗伤害感受产生显著左移。通过将这些数据与预测的环丙沙星 - 吗啡值(热板试验:1.61(95%置信区间:1.18, 2.51]μg;甩尾试验:0.82(95%置信区间:0.52, 1.92)μg)进行比较,我们估计环丙沙星和吗啡至少产生相加作用(P>0.05)。腹腔注射纳洛酮可使其逆转(P<0.05)。腹腔注射庆大霉素不影响鞘内注射吗啡所达到的抗伤害感受(热板试验:庆大霉素 - 吗啡的半数有效量ED50 = 2.71(95%置信区间:2.35;3.2)μg;甩尾试验:庆大霉素 - 吗啡的半数有效量ED50 = 2.43(95%置信区间:1.58;5.22]μg;P>0.05)。这些数据表明,腹腔注射环丙沙星和庆大霉素在热板试验和甩尾试验中产生适度的抗伤害感受作用。环丙沙星而非庆大霉素可至少相加地作用于增强纳洛酮可逆的鞘内吗啡抗伤害感受。两种抗生素穿透血脑屏障能力的差异可解释庆大霉素在热板试验中无作用以及对吗啡诱导的抗伤害感受无影响的原因。