Burckhardt Carol S, Jones Kim D
Primary Care, School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Apr 28;3:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-30.
Most research and treatment of post-breast cancer chronic pain has focused on local or regional pain problems in the operated area. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare and contrast the pain characteristics, symptom impact, health status, and quality of life of post-breast cancer surgery women with regional chronic pain versus those with widespread chronic pain.
A cross-sectional, descriptive design compared two groups of women with chronic pain that began after surgery: regional pain (n = 11) and widespread pain (n = 12). Demographics, characteristics of the surgery, as well as standardized questionnaires that measured pain (Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ-SF)), disease impact (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)), health status (Medical Outcomes Short Form (SF-36)) and quality of life (Quality of Life Scale (QOLS)) were gathered.
There were no significant differences between the groups on any demographic or type of surgery variable. A majority of both groups described their pain as aching, tender, and sharp on the MPQ-SF. On the BPI, intensity of pain and pain interference were significantly higher in the widespread pain group. Differences between the two groups reached statistical significance on the FIQ total score as well as the FACT-B physical well-being, emotional well-being and breast concerns subscales. The SF-36 physical function, physical role, and body pain subscales were significantly lower in the widespread pain group. QOLS scores were lower in the widespread pain group, but did not reach statistical significance.
This preliminary work suggests that the women in this study who experienced widespread pain after breast cancer surgery had significantly more severity of pain, pain impact and lower physical health status than those with regional pain.
大多数关于乳腺癌后慢性疼痛的研究和治疗都集中在手术区域的局部或区域性疼痛问题上。这项初步研究的目的是比较和对比乳腺癌手术后患有区域性慢性疼痛的女性与患有广泛性慢性疼痛的女性的疼痛特征、症状影响、健康状况和生活质量。
采用横断面描述性设计,比较两组手术后开始出现慢性疼痛的女性:区域性疼痛组(n = 11)和广泛性疼痛组(n = 12)。收集了人口统计学资料、手术特征,以及测量疼痛的标准化问卷(简明疼痛量表(BPI)、简短麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ-SF))、疾病影响(纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)、癌症治疗功能评估-乳腺癌(FACT-B))、健康状况(医学结局简表(SF-36))和生活质量(生活质量量表(QOLS))。
两组在任何人口统计学或手术变量类型上均无显著差异。两组中的大多数人在MPQ-SF上将他们的疼痛描述为酸痛、压痛和刺痛。在BPI上,广泛性疼痛组的疼痛强度和疼痛干扰明显更高。两组在FIQ总分以及FACT-B的身体幸福感、情绪幸福感和乳房问题子量表上的差异具有统计学意义。广泛性疼痛组的SF-36身体功能、身体角色和身体疼痛子量表明显更低。广泛性疼痛组的QOLS得分更低,但未达到统计学意义。
这项初步研究表明,本研究中乳腺癌手术后经历广泛性疼痛的女性比患有区域性疼痛的女性疼痛程度明显更严重、疼痛影响更大且身体健康状况更低。