Curtis Clayton E, Sun Felice T, Miller Lee M, D'Esposito Mark
Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY 10003, USA.
Neuroimage. 2005 May 15;26(1):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.040.
Widespread and distributed brain regions are thought to form networks that together support working memory. We recently demonstrated that different cortical areas maintain relatively different codes across a memory delay (Curtis et. al., J Neurosci, 2004; 24:3944-3952). The frontal eye fields (FEF), for example, were more active during the delay when the direction of the memory-guided saccade was known compared to when it was not known throughout the delay. Other areas showed the opposite pattern. Despite these task-dependent differences in regional activity, we could only assume but not address the functional interactions between the identified nodes of the putative network. Here, we use a bivariate technique, coherence, to formally characterize functional interactions between a seed region and other brain areas. We find that the type of representational codes that are being maintained in working memory biases frontal-parietal interactions. For example, coherence between FEF and other oculomotor areas was greater when a motor representation was an efficient strategy to bridge the delay period. However, coherence between the FEF and higher-order heteromodal areas, e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, was greater when a sensory representation must be maintained in working memory.
广泛分布的脑区被认为共同形成支持工作记忆的网络。我们最近证明,不同的皮质区域在记忆延迟期间保持相对不同的编码(柯蒂斯等人,《神经科学杂志》,2004年;24:3944 - 3952)。例如,与在整个延迟期间记忆引导扫视方向未知时相比,当记忆引导扫视方向已知时,额叶眼动区(FEF)在延迟期间更活跃。其他区域则呈现相反的模式。尽管区域活动存在这些任务依赖的差异,但我们只能假设而无法探讨假定网络中已识别节点之间的功能相互作用。在此,我们使用一种双变量技术——相干性,来正式表征种子区域与其他脑区之间的功能相互作用。我们发现,工作记忆中维持的表征编码类型会使额顶叶相互作用产生偏差。例如,当运动表征是跨越延迟期的有效策略时,FEF与其他眼动区之间的相干性更大。然而,当必须在工作记忆中维持感觉表征时,FEF与高阶异模态区域(如背外侧前额叶皮质)之间的相干性更大。