Mullenix Philip S, Brown Tommy A, Meyers Micheal O, Giles Lydia R, Sigurdson Elin R, Boraas Marcia C, Hoffman John P, Eisenberg Burton L, Torosian Michael H
Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040A Reid Street, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA.
Am J Surg. 2005 May;189(5):606-9; discussion 609. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.031.
The purpose of this study was to better characterize the clinical significance of cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC)-only-positive lymph node metastases among patients with breast cancer.
We performed a retrospective review of 334 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy from 1 February 1997 through 31 July 2001. SLN biopsies were evaluated using standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) techniques. If H&E was negative, cytokeratin IHC was performed. We then evaluated the incidence of subsequent regional and distant metastatic disease.
Cytokeratin IHC was performed on 183 sentinel node biopsies from 180 patients comprising a total of 427 sentinel lymph nodes. The procedures included lumpectomy and SLN biopsy (n = 83), mastectomy with SLN biopsy (n = 7), lumpectomy with SLN biopsy and completion axillary dissection (n = 80), and modified radical mastectomy with SLN biopsy and completion axillary dissection (n = 13). Cytokeratin IHC was negative in 175 axillary specimens and positive in 8 (4.4%) from 8 different patients. In these eight specimens, deeper sections with subsequent H&E staining additionally identified micrometastasis in four patients. Three of these 8 patients (37.5%) developed distant metastatic disease compared with 1 of the 172 patients (0.6%) with negative cytokeratin IHC (P < .001). Additionally, one of the cytokeratin-positive patients developed regional nodal metastasis compared with none of the 172 cytokeratin-negative patients.
Cytokeratin IHC provides a clinically relevant adjunct to H&E staining for evaluating sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. These data suggest that patients with cytokeratin-positive sentinel nodes are at increased risk for development of regional and distant metastatic disease.
本研究的目的是更好地描述仅细胞角蛋白免疫组化(IHC)阳性的乳腺癌患者淋巴结转移的临床意义。
我们对1997年2月1日至2001年7月31日期间接受前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检的334例患者进行了回顾性研究。使用标准苏木精和伊红(H&E)技术对SLN活检进行评估。如果H&E为阴性,则进行细胞角蛋白IHC检测。然后我们评估了后续区域和远处转移性疾病的发生率。
对来自180例患者的183份前哨淋巴结活检进行了细胞角蛋白IHC检测,共计427个前哨淋巴结。手术包括肿块切除术加SLN活检(n = 83)、乳房切除术加SLN活检(n = 7)、肿块切除术加SLN活检及腋窝清扫术(n = 80)以及改良根治性乳房切除术加SLN活检及腋窝清扫术(n = 13)。175份腋窝标本的细胞角蛋白IHC为阴性,8份(4.4%)来自8例不同患者的标本为阳性。在这8份标本中,后续进行H&E染色的更深切片在4例患者中额外发现了微转移。这8例患者中有3例(37.5%)发生了远处转移性疾病,而细胞角蛋白IHC阴性的172例患者中有1例(0.6%)发生了远处转移性疾病(P <.001)。此外,细胞角蛋白阳性的1例患者发生了区域淋巴结转移,而172例细胞角蛋白阴性的患者均未发生区域淋巴结转移。
细胞角蛋白IHC为评估乳腺癌前哨淋巴结的H&E染色提供了具有临床相关性的辅助手段。这些数据表明,细胞角蛋白阳性前哨淋巴结的患者发生区域和远处转移性疾病的风险增加。