• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织骨髓增生异常综合征分类的临床意义。

The clinical implications of the World Health Organization's classification of myelodysplastic syndromes.

作者信息

Komrokji Rami S, Bennett John M

机构信息

James P Wilmot Cancer Center, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

Curr Hematol Rep. 2005 May;4(3):175-81.

PMID:15865868
Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of neoplastic clonal stem cell diseases characterized by dysplastic morphological features with a varying percentage of leukemic blasts and clinical bone marrow failure. The French-American-British (FAB) system served as the gold standard of MDS classification for more than two decades. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification, built on the backbone of the FAB classification, is an attempt to further improve the prognostic value of MDS classification as well as to establish its clinical utility as a tool to select different treatments. In this article we highlight the major differences between the FAB classification and the WHO MDS classification. We discuss in more details the experience of using the new WHO classification since its publications and review the studies that tried to either validate the prognostic value of the new classification or apply it to predict clinical responses to various treatments.

摘要

骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)是一组异质性的肿瘤性克隆性干细胞疾病,其特征为发育异常的形态学特征、不同比例的白血病原始细胞以及临床骨髓衰竭。法美英(FAB)系统作为MDS分类的金标准已有二十多年。世界卫生组织(WHO)分类以FAB分类为基础,旨在进一步提高MDS分类的预后价值,并确立其作为选择不同治疗方法工具的临床实用性。在本文中,我们重点介绍FAB分类与WHO MDS分类之间的主要差异。我们更详细地讨论自WHO新分类发布以来使用该分类的经验,并回顾那些试图验证新分类的预后价值或应用其预测各种治疗临床反应的研究。

相似文献

1
The clinical implications of the World Health Organization's classification of myelodysplastic syndromes.世界卫生组织骨髓增生异常综合征分类的临床意义。
Curr Hematol Rep. 2005 May;4(3):175-81.
2
The myelodysplastic syndromes: diagnosis, molecular biology and risk assessment.骨髓增生异常综合征:诊断、分子生物学及风险评估
Hematology. 2005;10 Suppl 1:258-69. doi: 10.1080/10245330512331390311.
3
Who is WHO in myelodysplastic syndromes? Clinical implications of the WHO classification.谁是骨髓增生异常综合征中的 WHO?WHO 分类的临床意义。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2006 Mar;1(1):9-15. doi: 10.1007/s11899-006-0011-x.
4
The myelodysplastic syndromes: classification and prognosis.骨髓增生异常综合征:分类与预后
Curr Hematol Rep. 2003 May;2(3):179-85.
5
A comparative review of classification systems in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)分类系统的比较综述。
Semin Oncol. 2005 Aug;32(4 Suppl 5):S3-10. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.06.021.
6
Classification and scoring systems in myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 311 patients.骨髓增生异常综合征的分类和评分系统:311例患者的回顾性分析
Leuk Res. 2006 Aug;30(8):971-7. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.11.015. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
7
World Health Organization classification in combination with cytogenetic markers improves the prognostic stratification of patients with de novo primary myelodysplastic syndromes.世界卫生组织分类与细胞遗传学标志物相结合可改善初发原发性骨髓增生异常综合征患者的预后分层。
Br J Haematol. 2007 May;137(3):193-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06537.x.
8
Comparison of five prognostic scoring systems, the French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Results of a single-center analysis.五种预后评分系统、法国-美国-英国(FAB)分类法和世界卫生组织(WHO)分类法在骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的比较:一项单中心分析结果
Ann Hematol. 2006 Aug;85(8):502-13. doi: 10.1007/s00277-005-0030-z. Epub 2006 May 20.
9
Detection of risk groups in myelodysplastic syndromes. A multicenter study.骨髓增生异常综合征风险组的检测。一项多中心研究。
Haematologica. 2002 Jan;87(1):9-16.
10
Evolving classifications of the myelodysplastic syndromes.骨髓增生异常综合征不断演变的分类
Curr Opin Hematol. 2007 Mar;14(2):98-105. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e328017f633.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness in Canada of azacitidine for the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.加拿大阿扎胞苷治疗高危骨髓增生异常综合征的成本效益分析。
Curr Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(1):e29-40. doi: 10.3747/co.21.1311.
2
Therapy related CMML: a case report and review of the literature.治疗相关的慢性粒单核细胞白血病:一例病例报告及文献综述
Int J Hematol. 2009 Jun;89(5):699-703. doi: 10.1007/s12185-009-0318-1. Epub 2009 May 9.