Joseph George, Chandy Sunil, George Paul, George Oommen, John Bobby, Pati Purendra, Jose Jacob
Professor of Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632 004, India.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 Mar;17(3):132-8.
The over-the-wire double balloon technique (DBT) of balloon mitral valvuloplasty (BMV) has been decreasingly used in recent years because of its relative complexity and potential for left ventricular perforation. We attempted to make over-the-wire BMV simpler and safer by developing: (a) a single balloon technique (SBT) using a rapidly inflating, over-the-wire, cylindrical balloon having abrupt distal taper and short blunt tip to prevent left ventricular perforation, and (b) an alternative jugular approach to reduce technical difficulty in patients with cardiac anatomic distortion. SBT-BMV was evaluated over seven years in 1,407 consecutive patients (femoral approach: 1,277 patients, jugular approach: 130 patients), and compared with 954 patients who underwent DBT-BMV earlier at the same center. Results of SBT-BMV were comparable to those of DBT-BMV: optimal outcomes (91.0% versus 87.8%), fluoroscopy time (12.4 +/- 6.8 minutes versus 17.6 +/- 7.2 minutes), significant right heart oxygen step-up (4.8% versus 10.7%), and major complication rates (3.7% versus 5.6%) were significantly better with SBT-BMV; whereas mean post-BMV mitral valve area (1.92 +/- 0.31 cm2 versus 2.03 +/- 0.42 cm2), and post-BMV hemodynamic parameters were inferior with SBT-BMV. Balloon-related left ventricular perforation did not occur in SBT-BMV. Fluoroscopy time in jugular approach SBT-BMV (9.0 +/- 4.2 minutes) was significantly lower than in the femoral approach SBT-BMV (12.4 +/- 6.8 minutes) despite cardiac anatomic distortion. SBT-BMV reduced procedural costs considerably. SBT-BMV was effective, safe, technically simple and economical; it was comparable to, and overcame several limitations of DBT-BMV.
近年来,由于经导丝双球囊二尖瓣成形术(BMV)相对复杂且有导致左心室穿孔的风险,其应用已逐渐减少。我们试图通过开发以下方法使经导丝BMV更简单、更安全:(a)一种单球囊技术(SBT),使用快速膨胀的经导丝圆柱形球囊,球囊远端呈突然变细且尖端短钝以防止左心室穿孔;(b)一种替代的颈静脉入路,以降低心脏解剖结构扭曲患者的技术难度。在连续1407例患者中对SBT-BMV进行了为期七年的评估(股动脉入路:1277例患者,颈静脉入路:130例患者),并与同一中心早期接受DBT-BMV的954例患者进行比较。SBT-BMV的结果与DBT-BMV相当:最佳结果(91.0%对87.8%)、透视时间(12.4±6.8分钟对17.6±7.2分钟)、右心氧分压显著升高(4.8%对10.7%)以及主要并发症发生率(3.7%对5.6%),SBT-BMV明显更好;而BMV术后平均二尖瓣面积(1.92±0.31cm²对2.03±0.42cm²)以及BMV术后血流动力学参数,SBT-BMV较差。SBT-BMV未发生与球囊相关的左心室穿孔。尽管存在心脏解剖结构扭曲,但颈静脉入路SBT-BMV的透视时间(9.0±4.2分钟)显著低于股动脉入路SBT-BMV(12.4±6.8分钟)。SBT-BMV显著降低了手术成本。SBT-BMV有效、安全、技术简单且经济;它与DBT-BMV相当,并克服了DBT-BMV的几个局限性。