Coudeville Laurent, Brunot Alain, Szucs Thomas D, Dervaux Benoit
CRESGE-LABORES, Catholic University of Lille, France.
Value Health. 2005 May-Jun;8(3):209-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04005.x.
To determine the economic impact of childhood varicella vaccination in France and Germany.
A common methodology based on the use of a varicella transmission model was used for the two countries. Cost data (2002 per thousand) were derived from two previous studies. The analysis focused on a routine vaccination program for which three different coverage rates (CRs) were considered (90%, 70%, and 45%). Catch-up strategies were also analyzed. A societal perspective including both direct and indirect costs and a third-party payer perspective were considered (Social Security in France and Sickness Funds in Germany).
A routine vaccination program has a clear positive impact on varicella-related morbidity in both countries. With a 90% CR, the number of varicella-related deaths was reduced by 87% in Germany and by 84% in France. In addition, with a CR of 90%, routine varicella vaccination induces savings in both countries from both societal (Germany 61%, France 60%) and third-party payer perspectives (Germany 51%, France 6.7%). For lower CRs, routine vaccination remains cost saving from a third-party payer perspective in Germany but not in France, where it is nevertheless cost-effective (cost per life-year gained of 6521 per thousand in the base case with a 45% CR).
Considering the impact of vaccination on varicella morbidity and costs, a routine varicella vaccination program appears to be cost saving in Germany and France from both a societal and a third-party payer perspective. For France, routine varicella vaccination remains cost-effective in worst cases when a third-party payer perspective is adopted. Catch-up programs provide additional savings.
确定儿童水痘疫苗接种在法国和德国的经济影响。
两国采用基于水痘传播模型的通用方法。成本数据(2002年每千人)来自之前的两项研究。分析聚焦于一项常规疫苗接种计划,该计划考虑了三种不同的覆盖率(90%、70%和45%)。还分析了补种策略。考虑了包括直接和间接成本的社会视角以及第三方支付者视角(法国的社会保障和德国的疾病基金)。
常规疫苗接种计划对两国与水痘相关的发病率有明显的积极影响。覆盖率为90%时,德国与水痘相关的死亡人数减少了87%,法国减少了84%。此外,覆盖率为90%时,常规水痘疫苗接种在两国从社会视角(德国61%,法国60%)和第三方支付者视角(德国51%,法国6.7%)都带来了节省。对于较低的覆盖率,从第三方支付者视角来看,德国的常规疫苗接种仍能节省成本,但法国则不然,不过在法国该接种计划仍具有成本效益(在覆盖率为45%的基础案例中,每获得一个生命年的成本为每千人6521)。
考虑到疫苗接种对水痘发病率和成本的影响,从社会和第三方支付者视角来看,常规水痘疫苗接种计划在德国和法国似乎都能节省成本。对于法国,在采用第三方支付者视角的最坏情况下,常规水痘疫苗接种仍具有成本效益。补种计划能带来额外的节省。