Harris L, Bombin M, Chi F, DeBortoli T, Long J
Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Rural Remote Health. 2004 Jan-Mar;4(1):240. Epub 2004 Feb 9.
There is ample documentation that use of hospital emergency facilities for reasons other than urgencies/emergencies results in clogged services in many urban centers. However, little has been published about similar misuse of emergency rooms/departments in rural and remote areas, where the situation is usually compounded by a scarcity of healthcare professionals. In Canada there is a shortage of physicians in rural and remote areas as a consequence of misdistribution (most physicians staying in southern urban centers after residence), and there is a chronic misuse of facilities meant for urgencies/emergencies to cope with primary healthcare needs. We address the problem in Elliot Lake, a rural Northern Ontario community of 12,000 people. The economy of Elliot Lake was based on uranium mining until the mid-1990s, when it drastically changed to become a center for affordable retirement and recreational tourism. As a consequence, at the present time the proportion of seniors in Elliot Lake doubles the Canadian average. Our objectives are to elucidate the demographics of emergency room (ER) clients and the effect of the elderly population; the nature of ER use; the perceived level of urgency of clients versus health professionals; and possible alternatives offered to non-urgent/emergency visits. This is the first study of the kind in Northern Ontario, a region the size of France.
The study, conducted in July 2001, used a prospective survey, completed by patients and attending clinicians at the time of a patient's presentation to the ER of St Joseph's General Hospital. This hospital is staffed by family physicians, a nurse practitioner, and registered nurses (RNs). The catchment area population (town plus surrounding areas) of the hospital is approximately 18,000 people. ER clients were interviewed verbally, and the attending health professionals responded to written questionnaires. Demographics were recorded (age, sex, employment and marital status), as was each client's reason for making an ER visit. Clients were asked if they had a family physician and if they had contacted him/her before visiting the ER, and if they would use another agency to address their health problem. Each client's, nurse's, and physician/nurse practitioner's perceived urgency level was recorded on a scale from 1 (non-urgent) to 5 (extremely urgent/life threatening). The attending physician/nurse practitioner and attending nurse were also asked to recommend appropriate alternatives, in their judgment, to each ER visit.
Of a total of 1472 ER cases, 1096 (74.5%) verbal interviews with clients were conducted, as well as 1298 (88.2%) and 1013 (68.8%) questionnaires were completed respectively by attending nurses and physicians/nurse practitioner. The age of the clients was roughly proportional to their cohorts in the catchment area. Males and females were equally represented in the sample. Only 28.8% of the clients contacted their family physicians before visiting the ER, although 80.9% of them had a family physician. The reasons for visiting the ER are mostly typical of a primary care practice in Canada, and ER clients considered 19.4% of their visits non-urgent/non-emergency. In contrast, 45.2% of the physicians/nurse practitioner and 63.7% of the nurses considered the visits non-urgent/non-emergency. To reduce ER misuse, two-thirds of the recommendations by staff were to recruit more family physicians and nurse practitioners, and another one-fifth of the recommendations suggested the creation of a walk-in clinic. Other alternatives, such as the use of a variety of agencies available in town, were minimally recommended by healthcare professionals.
The core of the problem identified by this research is that more physicians, nurse practitioners, and other health care professionals are needed in Elliot Lake to provide continuity of care. A new medical school is being created for the region, but the first family physicians from this initiative will only be available in 2012. In the meantime, healthcare professionals may need to take more preventive and educational measures to reduce ER misuse, and the use of other town's agencies, Telehealth, case-management of recurrent clients, and collaboration with local pharmacists need to be maximized. Further research is urgently needed into the effects on health outcomes in rural communities that may result from health services having to function beyond their capacity. Rural health clinicians, communities, researchers, and policy makers must work together to design, implement, and evaluate, both immediate and longer term solutions to the problems identified in this study.
有充分的文献记载,在许多城市中心,因非紧急情况使用医院急诊设施导致服务堵塞。然而,关于农村和偏远地区急诊室/部门类似的滥用情况,鲜有报道,而这些地区的情况通常因医疗专业人员短缺而更加复杂。在加拿大,农村和偏远地区存在医生分布不均的问题(大多数医生在定居后留在南部城市中心),导致这些地区医生短缺,并且长期存在将用于紧急情况的设施滥用于满足初级医疗需求的现象。我们以安大略省北部一个拥有12,000人口的农村社区埃利奥特湖为例来探讨这个问题。直到20世纪90年代中期,埃利奥特湖的经济一直以铀矿开采为基础,之后经济急剧转变,成为一个提供经济适用型退休和休闲旅游的中心。因此,目前埃利奥特湖老年人的比例是加拿大平均水平的两倍。我们的目标是阐明急诊室(ER)患者的人口统计学特征以及老年人口的影响;急诊室使用的性质;患者与医疗专业人员对紧急程度的认知;以及为非紧急就诊提供的可能替代方案。这是在安大略省北部进行的此类研究中的首例,该地区面积与法国相当。
该研究于2001年7月进行,采用前瞻性调查,由患者和圣约瑟夫综合医院急诊室的主治临床医生在患者就诊时完成。该医院的工作人员包括家庭医生、一名执业护士和注册护士(RN)。该医院的服务区域人口(城镇及周边地区)约为18,000人。对急诊室患者进行了口头访谈,主治医疗专业人员填写了书面问卷。记录了人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、就业和婚姻状况)以及每位患者前往急诊室就诊的原因。询问患者是否有家庭医生,就诊前是否联系过家庭医生,以及是否会使用其他机构来解决他们的健康问题。每位患者、护士以及医生/执业护士对紧急程度的认知水平按照从1(非紧急)到5(极其紧急/危及生命)的量表进行记录。主治医生/执业护士和主治护士还被要求根据他们的判断为每次急诊就诊推荐合适的替代方案。
在总共1472例急诊病例中,对1096例(74.5%)患者进行了口头访谈,主治护士和医生/执业护士分别完成了1298份(88.2%)和1013份(68.8%)问卷。患者的年龄与服务区域内相应人群大致成比例。样本中男性和女性的比例相当。只有28.8%的患者在就诊前联系过他们的家庭医生,尽管其中80.9%的患者有家庭医生。前往急诊室就诊的原因大多是加拿大初级医疗实践中的典型情况,急诊室患者认为他们19.4%的就诊并非紧急/非急诊情况。相比之下,45.2%的医生/执业护士和63.7%的护士认为这些就诊并非紧急/非急诊情况。为减少急诊室的滥用,工作人员三分之二的建议是招聘更多的家庭医生和执业护士,另有五分之一的建议是设立随到随诊诊所。医疗专业人员极少推荐其他替代方案,例如利用城镇中现有的各种机构。
本研究发现的问题核心是,埃利奥特湖需要更多的医生、执业护士和其他医疗专业人员来提供持续的医疗服务。该地区正在新建一所医学院,但首批来自该项目的家庭医生要到2012年才能到位。在此期间,医疗专业人员可能需要采取更多的预防和教育措施来减少急诊室的滥用,并且需要最大限度地利用其他城镇的机构、远程医疗、对复诊患者的病例管理以及与当地药剂师的合作。迫切需要进一步研究因医疗服务超负荷运转可能给农村社区健康结果带来的影响。农村健康临床医生、社区、研究人员和政策制定者必须共同努力,设计、实施和评估针对本研究中所确定问题的即时和长期解决方案。