Lim Soon Thye, Karim Roksana, Nathwani Bharat N, Tulpule Anil, Espina Byron, Levine Alexandra M
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;23(19):4430-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.973. Epub 2005 May 9.
To compare outcomes of patients with HIV-Burkitt's lymphoma (HIV-BL) and HIV-diffuse large-cell lymphoma (HIV-DLCL) after treatment with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) or M-BACOD (methotrexate, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) in pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) versus HAART eras.
Three hundred sixty-three patients with AIDS-related lymphoma diagnosed from 1982 to 2003 were reviewed retrospectively, including 262 in the pre-HAART (HIV-BL, 117; HIV-DLCL, 145) and 101 in the HAART era (HIV-BL, 18; HIV-DLCL, 83). Pre-HAART included those who did not receive HAART, and HAART era included those diagnosed after January 1997 who received HAART.
There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, history of injection drug use, prior AIDS, lactate dehydrogenase level, and disease stage at diagnosis. Compared with HIV-BL, HIV-DLCL was associated with significantly lower CD4 counts in the pre-HAART but not the HAART era. Although the overall median survival was similar for both groups in the pre-HAART era (HIV-BL, 6.4 months v HIV-DLCL, 8.3 months; P = .43), survival was significantly worse in patients with HIV-BL in the HAART era (HIV-BL, 5.7 months v HIV-DLCL, 43.2 months; P = .0003). Failure to attain complete remission and CD4 count less than 100 cells/mm(3) independently predicted for poor survival in the pre-HAART era. In comparison, histology of HIV-BL and no attainment of complete remission were independent poor prognostic factors in the HAART era.
Survival of patients with HIV-DLCL has improved in the HAART era, along with CD4 count, whereas survival of similarly treated patients with HIV-BL remained poor. The current practice of using the same regimen for both groups of patients should be re-evaluated.
比较在高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)前与HAART时代,接受CHOP(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱、泼尼松)或M-BACOD(甲氨蝶呤、博来霉素、环磷酰胺、依托泊苷)治疗的HIV相关性伯基特淋巴瘤(HIV-BL)和HIV弥漫性大细胞淋巴瘤(HIV-DLCL)患者的治疗结果。
回顾性分析了1982年至2003年诊断的363例艾滋病相关淋巴瘤患者,其中HAART前有262例(HIV-BL 117例,HIV-DLCL 145例),HAART时代有101例(HIV-BL 18例,HIV-DLCL 83例)。HAART前包括未接受HAART的患者,HAART时代包括1997年1月后诊断且接受HAART的患者。
两组在年龄、性别、注射吸毒史、既往艾滋病史、乳酸脱氢酶水平及诊断时疾病分期方面无显著差异。与HIV-BL相比,HIV-DLCL在HAART前CD4细胞计数显著更低,但在HAART时代并非如此。虽然在HAART前时代两组总体中位生存期相似(HIV-BL为6.4个月,HIV-DLCL为8.3个月;P = 0.43),但在HAART时代HIV-BL患者生存期显著更差(HIV-BL为5.7个月,HIV-DLCL为43.2个月;P = 0.0003)。在HAART前时代,未达到完全缓解和CD4细胞计数低于100个/立方毫米独立预测生存期较差。相比之下,HIV-BL的组织学类型和未达到完全缓解是HAART时代独立的不良预后因素。
在HAART时代,HIV-DLCL患者的生存期有所改善,CD4细胞计数也有所改善,而接受类似治疗的HIV-BL患者生存期仍然较差。应对目前两组患者使用相同治疗方案的做法重新进行评估。