Stanley Joanna L, Lincoln Rachael J, Brown Terry A, McDonald Louise M, Dawson Gerard R, Reynolds David S
Neuroscience Research Centre, Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, Terlings Park, Harlow, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 2005 May;19(3):221-7. doi: 10.1177/0269881105051524.
The mouse rotarod test of motor coordination/sedation is commonly used to predict clinical sedation caused by novel drugs. However, past experience suggests that it lacks the desired degree of sensitivity to be predictive of effects in humans. For example, the benzodiazepine, bretazenil, showed little impairment of mouse rotarod performance, but marked sedation in humans. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the mouse beam walking assay demonstrates: (i) an increased sensitivity over the rotarod and (ii) an increased ability to predict clinically sedative doses of benzodiazepines. The study compared the effects of the full benzodiazepine agonists, diazepam and lorazepam, and the partial agonist, bretazenil, on the mouse rotarod and beam walking assays. Diazepam and lorazepam significantly impaired rotarod performance, although relatively high GABA-A receptor occupancy was required (72% and 93%, respectively), whereas beam walking performance was significantly affected at approximately 30% receptor occupancy. Bretazenil produced significant deficits at 90% and 53% receptor occupancy on the rotarod and beam walking assays, respectively. The results suggest that the mouse beam walking assay is a more sensitive tool for determining benzodiazepine-induced motor coordination deficits than the rotarod. Furthermore, the GABA-A receptor occupancy values at which significant deficits were determined in the beam walking assay are comparable with those observed in clinical positron emission tomography studies using sedative doses of benzodiazepines. These data suggest that the beam walking assay may be able to more accurately predict the clinically sedative doses of novel benzodiazepine-like drugs.
小鼠转棒试验用于评估运动协调性/镇静作用,常用于预测新型药物引起的临床镇静效果。然而,以往经验表明,该试验缺乏预测人体效应所需的敏感度。例如,苯二氮䓬类药物布瑞西泮对小鼠转棒试验表现影响较小,但在人体中却有明显的镇静作用。本研究旨在评估小鼠横梁行走试验是否具有:(i)相较于转棒试验更高的敏感度;(ii)更强的预测苯二氮䓬类药物临床镇静剂量的能力。该研究比较了完全激动剂地西泮和劳拉西泮以及部分激动剂布瑞西泮对小鼠转棒试验和横梁行走试验的影响。地西泮和劳拉西泮显著损害了转棒试验表现,尽管需要相对较高的GABA - A受体占有率(分别为72%和93%),而横梁行走试验表现则在受体占有率约为30%时受到显著影响。布瑞西泮在转棒试验和横梁行走试验中,分别在受体占有率达到90%和53%时产生显著缺陷。结果表明,小鼠横梁行走试验在确定苯二氮䓬类药物引起的运动协调性缺陷方面,是比转棒试验更敏感的工具。此外,在横梁行走试验中确定显著缺陷时的GABA - A受体占有率值,与使用苯二氮䓬类药物镇静剂量的临床正电子发射断层扫描研究中观察到的值相当。这些数据表明,横梁行走试验或许能够更准确地预测新型苯二氮䓬类药物的临床镇静剂量。