Tancredi L R, Bovbjerg R R
University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston.
Milbank Q. 1992;70(1):183-216.
Today's unduly erratic and expensive payment system for medical malpractice undercuts its own goal of compensating victims. Its lack of scientific legitimacy hampers its other main goal of deterring injury. Reform is needed, but most "tort reform" fails to make fundamental changes and does not promote quality of care. Alternative systems using "Accelerated Compensation Events" (ACEs) offer a better way to replace or improve judicial resolution of liability claims as well as independent, quality-oriented reform. ACEs do not cover all injuries, just classes of adverse outcomes that are normally avoidable, given good care. This article explains the scientific methodology of ACE development and the benefits of ACE-based reforms.
如今,医疗事故赔偿制度过于不稳定且费用高昂,削弱了其补偿受害者的初衷。其缺乏科学合理性,阻碍了其威慑伤害这一主要目标的实现。改革势在必行,但大多数“侵权法改革”未能做出根本性改变,也未能提升医疗质量。采用“加速赔偿事件”(ACEs)的替代制度为取代或改进责任索赔的司法解决方式以及进行独立的、以质量为导向的改革提供了更好的途径。ACEs并不涵盖所有伤害,仅针对在优质护理条件下通常可避免的不良后果类别。本文阐述了ACEs制定的科学方法以及基于ACEs的改革所带来的益处。