Loewy Erich H, Loewy Roberta Springer
Associate Department of Philosophy, University of California, Davis, USA.
Health Care Anal. 2005 Mar;13(1):73-86. doi: 10.1007/s10728-005-2571-7.
This paper sets out to examine the integrity and professional standing of "Bioethics." It argues that professions have certain responsibilities that start with setting criteria for and credentialing those that have met the criteria and goes on to ultimately have social responsibilities to the community. As it now stands we claim that Bioethics--while it certainly has achieved some progress in the way medicine has developed--has failed to become a profession and has to a large extent failed in its social responsibility. We feel that Bioethics has to define itself, set criteria for membership in the profession, police itself and--above all--meet its social responsibility to become a profession meriting that name.
本文旨在审视“生物伦理学”的完整性和专业地位。文章认为,专业领域有特定的责任,始于为达到标准者设定标准并授予资质,最终对社会负有社会责任。就目前而言,我们认为生物伦理学——尽管在医学发展方式上确实取得了一些进展——未能成为一个专业领域,并且在很大程度上未能履行其社会责任。我们觉得生物伦理学必须明确自身定义,设定专业成员标准,自我监管,最重要的是履行其社会责任,从而成为名副其实的专业领域。