Tanigawa Nobuyuki, Saito Takanori, Ogawa Koji, Iida Hirokazu
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
J Neurotrauma. 2005 May;22(5):605-12. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.605.
It has been shown that end-to-side coaptation and nerve bypass grafting, which are essentially two sequential end-to-side coaptations, induce axonal outgrowth in peripheral nerve injuries. However, it is unknown whether the axons regenerated after end-to-side coaptation originate by collateral sprouting at the suture site or by elongation from the spinal neuronal pool. Also unknown is the extent of functional recovery that can be expected after bypass grafting for the reconstruction of injured peripheral nerves. We conducted a study to evaluate the origin of regenerated axons after end-to-side coaptation and the utility of nerve bypass grafting for peripheral nerve injury. For this purpose, we performed electrophysiological studies using bypass grafting (end-to-side coaptation) and conventional cable grafting (end-to-end coaptation) to treat complete paralysis of the peroneal nerve in rabbit models, and compared the recovery time and extent of functional recovery achieved with the two techniques. We assessed, by electromyography, the time to appearance of reinnervation potentials from the tibialis anterior muscle on the affected side. These times were not significantly different in the two study groups of animals (p = 0.5390). After a 12-week recovery period, electrophysiological findings and histological assessment showed similar recovery in both groups of animals. It is known that collateral sprouting of axons from the nodes of Ranvier proximal to the transected nerve stump occurs in cable grafting, and that axon elongation from the spinal cord requires more time. Our findings in the present study strongly suggest that collateral sprouting across end-to-side sutures is the chief means of axonal outgrowth in nerve bypass grafts, and that functional recovery can be expected in bypass grafting to nearly the same extent as in cable grafting.
已经表明,端侧吻合和神经搭桥移植(本质上是两个连续的端侧吻合)可诱导周围神经损伤中的轴突生长。然而,尚不清楚端侧吻合后再生的轴突是通过缝合部位的侧支发芽还是从脊髓神经元池伸长产生的。同样未知的是,在用于重建受损周围神经的搭桥移植后可预期的功能恢复程度。我们进行了一项研究,以评估端侧吻合后再生轴突的起源以及神经搭桥移植对周围神经损伤的效用。为此,我们在兔模型中使用搭桥移植(端侧吻合)和传统的电缆移植(端端吻合)进行电生理研究,以治疗腓总神经完全麻痹,并比较了两种技术实现的恢复时间和功能恢复程度。我们通过肌电图评估了患侧胫前肌出现再支配电位的时间。在两组动物研究中,这些时间没有显著差异(p = 0.5390)。经过12周的恢复期后,电生理结果和组织学评估显示两组动物的恢复情况相似。已知在电缆移植中,从横断神经残端近端的郎飞结处会发生轴突的侧支发芽,而从脊髓的轴突伸长需要更多时间。我们在本研究中的发现强烈表明,端侧缝合处的侧支发芽是神经搭桥移植中轴突生长的主要方式,并且可以预期搭桥移植的功能恢复程度与电缆移植几乎相同。