Kane-Gill S L, Feng Y, Bobek M B, Bies R R, Pruchnicki M C, Dasta J F
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2005 Jun;30(3):207-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2005.00634.x.
To describe the clinical use and safety of continuous infusion (CI) enoxaparin in a naturalistic setting and to evaluate the influence of renal function on enoxaparin elimination.
Retrospective medical record review.
1000-bed tertiary care teaching centre.
Hospitalized patients that received enoxaparin by CI during a 2-year period.
None.
Specific details of dosage and monitoring were collected. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were recorded. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was calculated using Cockroft and Gault and Brater equations. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the non-linear mixed effect model (NONMEM). For patients located in the intensive care unit (ICU) and ward, POSTHOC pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the association between renal function and anti-Xa clearance.
Sixty-seven patients received enoxaparin by CI of which 61.2% were in the ward and 38.8% in the ICU. The average initial rate and duration of infusion were 5.2 mg/h and 5.6 days, respectively. The number of anti-Xa concentration measurements averaged five per patient. Nine patients experienced an ADR. The most frequent ADR was gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 4). Among the 67 patients, 48 had available anti-Xa concentrations and were included in the NONMEM model. The anti-Xa CL and volume of distribution for ICU and ward patients averaged 0.64 +/- 0.34 L/h, 10.6 +/- 1.55 L and 1.01 +/- 0.39 L/h, 9.08 +/- 1.17 L, respectively. CrCl was not a significant covariate when included in the NONMEM model, and the association between CrCl and anti-Xa clearance was not significant (R2 = 0.0005; P = 0.8916).
This study is the first to report the use and safety of prolonged CI enoxaparin. Pharmacokinetic parameters of enoxaparin differ in ICU vs. ward patients. Overall, we found the safety of CI to be comparable to subcutaneous administration. Also, we found no effect of renal function on enoxaparin elimination.
描述在实际临床环境中持续输注(CI)依诺肝素的临床应用和安全性,并评估肾功能对依诺肝素清除的影响。
回顾性病历审查。
拥有1000张床位的三级医疗教学中心。
在两年期间接受CI依诺肝素治疗的住院患者。
无。
收集剂量和监测的具体细节。记录药物不良反应(ADR)。使用Cockroft和Gault以及Brater公式计算肌酐清除率(CrCl)。使用非线性混合效应模型(NONMEM)进行群体药代动力学分析。对于重症监护病房(ICU)和病房的患者,使用Wilcoxon秩和检验评估事后药代动力学参数估计值。计算Pearson相关系数以确定肾功能与抗Xa清除率之间的关联。
六十七名患者接受了CI依诺肝素治疗,其中61.2%在病房,38.8%在ICU。平均初始输注速率和持续时间分别为5.2毫克/小时和5.6天。每位患者抗Xa浓度测量次数平均为五次。九名患者出现ADR。最常见的ADR是胃肠道出血(n = 4)。在67名患者中,48名有可用的抗Xa浓度并被纳入NONMEM模型。ICU和病房患者的抗Xa清除率(CL)和分布容积分别平均为0.64±0.34升/小时、10.6±1.55升和1.01±0.39升/小时、9.08±1.17升。当纳入NONMEM模型时,CrCl不是一个显著的协变量,并且CrCl与抗Xa清除率之间的关联不显著(R2 = 0.0005;P = 0.8916)。
本研究首次报告了延长CI依诺肝素的使用情况和安全性。依诺肝素的药代动力学参数在ICU患者和病房患者中有所不同。总体而言,我们发现CI的安全性与皮下给药相当。此外,我们发现肾功能对依诺肝素清除没有影响。