Dennis Jayne L, Hvidsten Torgeir R, Wit Ernst C, Komorowski Jan, Bell Alexandra K, Downie Ian, Mooney Jacqueline, Verbeke Caroline, Bellamy Christopher, Keith W Nicol, Oien Karin A
Cancer Research UK Centre for Oncology and Applied Pharmacology, Beatson Laboratories, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Glasgow G61 1BD, United Kingdom.
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 15;11(10):3766-72. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2236.
PURPOSE: Patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown origin are a common clinical problem. Knowledge of the primary site is important for their management, but histologically, such tumors appear similar. Better diagnostic markers are needed to enable the assignment of metastases to likely sites of origin on pathologic samples. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression profiling of 27 candidate markers was done using tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry. In the first (training) round, we studied 352 primary adenocarcinomas, from seven main sites (breast, colon, lung, ovary, pancreas, prostate and stomach) and their differential diagnoses. Data were analyzed in Microsoft Access and the Rosetta system, and used to develop a classification scheme. In the second (validation) round, we studied 100 primary adenocarcinomas and 30 paired metastases. RESULTS: In the first round, we generated expression profiles for all 27 candidate markers in each of the seven main primary sites. Data analysis led to a simplified diagnostic panel and decision tree containing 10 markers only: CA125, CDX2, cytokeratins 7 and 20, estrogen receptor, gross cystic disease fluid protein 15, lysozyme, mesothelin, prostate-specific antigen, and thyroid transcription factor 1. Applying the panel and tree to the original data provided correct classification in 88%. The 10 markers and diagnostic algorithm were then tested in a second, independent, set of primary and metastatic tumors and again 88% were correctly classified. CONCLUSIONS: This classification scheme should enable better prediction on biopsy material of the primary site in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown origin, leading to improved management and therapy.
目的:原发部位不明的转移性腺癌患者是常见的临床问题。了解原发部位对其治疗很重要,但从组织学上看,这类肿瘤表现相似。需要更好的诊断标志物来在病理样本上确定转移灶的可能原发部位。 实验设计:使用组织微阵列和免疫组化对27种候选标志物进行表达谱分析。在第一轮(训练)中,我们研究了来自七个主要部位(乳腺、结肠、肺、卵巢、胰腺、前列腺和胃)的352例原发性腺癌及其鉴别诊断。数据在Microsoft Access和Rosetta系统中进行分析,并用于制定分类方案。在第二轮(验证)中,我们研究了100例原发性腺癌和30对配对转移灶。 结果:在第一轮中,我们生成了七个主要原发部位中每个部位所有27种候选标志物的表达谱。数据分析得出一个简化的诊断面板和决策树,仅包含10种标志物:CA125、CDX2、细胞角蛋白7和20、雌激素受体、巨大囊肿病液体蛋白15、溶菌酶、间皮素、前列腺特异性抗原和甲状腺转录因子1。将该面板和决策树应用于原始数据,正确分类率为88%。然后在另一组独立的原发性和转移性肿瘤中测试这10种标志物和诊断算法,正确分类率再次为88%。 结论:这种分类方案应能更好地预测原发部位不明的转移性腺癌患者活检材料的原发部位,从而改善治疗和管理。
Clin Cancer Res. 2005-5-15
Am J Surg Pathol. 2007-9
Cancer. 2004-5-1
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007-10
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006-2
Diagn Pathol. 2025-4-11
Can Vet J. 2023-9
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024-2
Breast Cancer Res. 2022-10-25