Lei Lih-Wei, Winn William, Scott Craig, Farr Andrew
Chihlee Institute of Technology, No. 313 Section 1 Wen-hua Road, Baneiao, Taipei 220, Taiwan, ROC.
Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005 May;284(1):28-34. doi: 10.1002/ar.b.20062.
The purpose of this study was to determine better strategies for the design and use of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) in health science subjects that require visual learning. Evaluation of current use of CAI was focused on three CD-based modules developed to teach histological images to beginning medical students at multiple sites. For internal control, students' learning outcomes and perceived effectiveness were analyzed with their demographic characteristics, computer attitude, computer experience, and learning behaviors being considered. Results indicated that students who used at least two different CAI programs scored significantly higher on the final examination than those who used only the CAI tool designed by their site's instructor. Further investigation indicated that students might have benefited from the interactive features of a specific CAI tool. Such scaffolds could have successfully supported encoding processes while students were restructuring their mental models. In addition, students perceived the CAI programs to be more effective when the tools were fully integrated into the curriculum. Perceived module effectiveness was significantly correlated with examination performance, suggesting a well-designed and appropriately used CAI tool may help students achieve not only learning efficiency, but also better learning outcome.
本研究的目的是确定在需要视觉学习的健康科学学科中设计和使用计算机辅助教学(CAI)的更好策略。对CAI当前使用情况的评估集中在为多个地点的医学新生教授组织学图像而开发的三个基于光盘的模块上。作为内部对照,分析了学生的学习成果和感知效果,并考虑了他们的人口统计学特征、计算机态度、计算机经验和学习行为。结果表明,使用至少两种不同CAI程序的学生在期末考试中的得分显著高于仅使用其所在地点教师设计的CAI工具的学生。进一步调查表明,学生可能受益于特定CAI工具的交互功能。在学生重构其心理模型时,此类支架可以成功支持编码过程。此外,当工具完全融入课程时,学生认为CAI程序更有效。感知到的模块有效性与考试成绩显著相关,这表明精心设计和恰当使用的CAI工具不仅可以帮助学生提高学习效率,还能取得更好的学习成果。