• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类触觉刺激缓解疼痛的皮层机制的时间分析。

Temporal analysis of cortical mechanisms for pain relief by tactile stimuli in humans.

作者信息

Inui Koji, Tsuji Takeshi, Kakigi Ryusuke

机构信息

Department of Integrative Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2006 Mar;16(3):355-65. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi114. Epub 2005 May 18.

DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhi114
PMID:15901650
Abstract

The mechanisms by which vibrotactile stimuli relieve pain are not well understood, especially in humans. We recorded cortical magnetic responses to paired noxious (intra-epidermal electrical stimulation, IES) and innocuous (transcutaneous electrical stimulation, TS) stimuli applied to the back at a conditioning-test interval (CTI) of -500 to 500 ms. Results showed that IES-induced responses were remarkably attenuated when TS was applied 20-60 ms later and 0-500 ms earlier than IES (CTI = -60 to 500 ms). Since the signals evoked by IES reached the spinal cord (CTI = -60 to -20 ms conditions) and the cortex (-60 and -40 ms condition) earlier than those evoked by TS, the present results indicate that cortical responses to noxious stimuli can be inhibited by innocuous tactile stimuli at the cortical level, with minimal contribution at the spinal level.

摘要

振动触觉刺激缓解疼痛的机制尚未完全明确,尤其是在人类中。我们记录了在-500至500毫秒的条件-测试间隔(CTI)下,对施加于背部的成对有害(表皮内电刺激,IES)和无害(经皮电刺激,TS)刺激的皮质磁反应。结果显示,当TS在IES之后20 - 60毫秒以及比IES早0 - 500毫秒施加时(CTI = -60至500毫秒),IES诱发的反应显著减弱。由于IES诱发的信号比TS诱发的信号更早到达脊髓(CTI = -60至-20毫秒条件)和皮质(-60和-40毫秒条件),目前的结果表明,在皮质水平,无害的触觉刺激可以抑制对有害刺激的皮质反应,而在脊髓水平的作用最小。

相似文献

1
Temporal analysis of cortical mechanisms for pain relief by tactile stimuli in humans.人类触觉刺激缓解疼痛的皮层机制的时间分析。
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Mar;16(3):355-65. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi114. Epub 2005 May 18.
2
Pain facilitates tactile processing in human somatosensory cortices.疼痛促进人类体感皮层中的触觉处理。
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Sep;92(3):1825-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00260.2004. Epub 2004 Apr 28.
3
Evoked response amplitudes from somatosensory cortices do not determine reaction times to tactile stimuli.体感皮层的诱发反应幅度并不能决定对触觉刺激的反应时间。
Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Jun;25(12):3734-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05611.x.
4
Cortical responses to noxious stimuli during sleep.睡眠期间对有害刺激的皮层反应。
Neuroscience. 2004;128(1):177-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.06.036.
5
Parietal cortex involvement in the localization of tactile and noxious mechanical stimuli: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.顶叶皮质在触觉和有害机械刺激定位中的作用:一项经颅磁刺激研究。
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Mar 28;178(2):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.011. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
6
Interference of tactile and pain stimuli on thalamocortical signal processing in humans revealed by median nerve SEPs.正中神经体感诱发电位揭示触觉和疼痛刺激对人类丘脑皮质信号处理的干扰。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Nov;118(11):2497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
7
BOLD adaptation in vibrotactile stimulation: neuronal networks involved in frequency discrimination.振动触觉刺激中的血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像适应性:参与频率辨别的神经网络。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):264-71. doi: 10.1152/jn.00617.2006. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
8
Cortical plasticity: effect of high and low intensity conditioning electrical stimulations (100 Hz) on SEPs to painful finger stimulation.皮质可塑性:高低强度条件性电刺激(100赫兹)对疼痛性手指刺激诱发的体感诱发电位的影响。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 May;117(5):1075-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.007. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
9
Cortical processing of near-threshold tactile stimuli: an MEG study.近阈值触觉刺激的皮质加工:一项 MEG 研究。
Psychophysiology. 2010 May 1;47(3):523-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00964.x. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
10
Abnormal response recovery in the right somatosensory cortex of dyslexic adults.
Cereb Cortex. 2005 May;15(5):507-13. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh150. Epub 2004 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Different ways to reach the same goal: Are the analgesic effects of different types of tactile stimuli similar?殊途同归:不同类型的触觉刺激的镇痛效果相似吗?
Eur J Pain. 2025 Jan;29(1):e4772. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4772.
2
Segmentation window of speech information processing in the human auditory cortex.人类听觉皮层中语音信息处理的分段窗口。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):25044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76137-y.
3
Brain-to-brain synchrony increased during interpersonal touch in romantic lovers: an EEG-based hyperscanning study.脑-脑同步在浪漫爱人间的人际触摸中增加:基于 EEG 的超扫描研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 16;12(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02051-7.
4
Reduced Cortico-Cortical Resting-State Connectivity in Sensory Systems Related to Bodily Pain in Juvenile Fibromyalgia.青少年纤维肌痛症与躯体疼痛相关的感觉系统皮质-皮质静息态连接减少。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;76(2):293-303. doi: 10.1002/art.42691. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
5
Recent Advances in Local Anesthesia: A Review of Literature.局部麻醉的最新进展:文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Mar 17;15(3):e36291. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36291. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Selective stimulation of nociceptive small fibers during intraepidermal electrical stimulation: Experiment and computational analysis.表皮内电刺激期间伤害性小纤维的选择性刺激:实验与计算分析。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 13;16:1045942. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1045942. eCollection 2022.
7
Somatosensory cortical signature of facial nociception and vibrotactile touch-induced analgesia.躯体感觉皮层对面部伤害性感受和振动触觉诱导镇痛的特征。
Sci Adv. 2022 Nov 18;8(46):eabn6530. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn6530. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
8
Distinct nociception processing in the dysgranular and barrel regions of the mouse somatosensory cortex.小鼠体感皮层颗粒区和桶状区的不同伤害感受处理。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 29;13(1):3622. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31272-w.
9
Dance for Chronic Pain Conditions: A Systematic Review.舞蹈治疗慢性疼痛疾病:系统综述。
Pain Med. 2022 Dec 1;23(12):2022-2041. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac092.
10
Late responses in the anterior insula reflect the cognitive component of pain: evidence of nonpain processing.前脑岛的延迟反应反映了疼痛的认知成分:非疼痛加工的证据。
Pain Rep. 2022 Feb 2;7(2):e984. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000984. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.