Montemurro Filippo, Martincich Laura, De Rosa Giovanni, Cirillo Stefano, Marra Vincenzo, Biglia Nicoletta, Gatti Marco, Sismondi Piero, Aglietta Massimo, Regge Daniele
Unit of Medical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC), Strada Provinciale 142, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1224-33. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2656-6. Epub 2005 Jan 27.
We compared dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and sonography (US) for monitoring tumour size in 21 patients with breast cancer undergoing primary chemotherapy (PCT) followed by surgery. The correlation between DCE-MRI and US measurements of tumour size, defined as the product of the two major diameters, was 0.555 (P=0.009), 0.782 (P<0.001), and 0.793 (P<0.001) at baseline, and after two and four cycles of PCT, respectively. The median tumour size was significantly larger when measured by DCE-MRI than by US at baseline (1472 vs 900 mm(2), P<0.001) and after two cycles of PCT (600 vs 400 mm(2), P=0.009). After PCT, the median tumour size measured by the two techniques was similar (256 vs 289 mm(2) for DCE-MRI and US, respectively, P=0.859). The correlation with the histopathological major tumour diameter was 0.824 (P<0.001) and 0.705 (P<0.001) for post-treatment DCE-MRI and US, respectively. Measurements of the final major tumour diameter by DCE-MRI tended to be more precise, including cases achieving a pathological complete response. Randomized trials are warranted to establish the clinical impact of the initial discrepancy in tumour size estimates between DCE-MRI and US, and the trend towards a better definition of the final tumour size provided by DCE-MRI in this clinical setting.