Lötsch Jörn
Pharmazentrum Frankfurt, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 May;29(5 Suppl):S90-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.01.012.
The effects of opioids usually parallel the plasma concentrations but with a temporal shift. This temporal shift differs between opioids. It is small with alfentanil or remifentanil and very long with the active metabolite of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). The mathematical and experimental techniques for modeling these pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships were developed in the late 1970s. The delay between plasma concentrations and effects is accounted for by the introduction of a hypothetic effect compartment, which is linked to the plasma compartment by a first-order transfer function with a rate constant k(e0). The effects are then linked to the concentrations at effects site by standard pharmacodynamic models such as sigmoid ("E(max)") models or power models, depending on the actual effect measure. These principles were first applied to the opioids fentanyl and alfentanil in 1985. Since then, PK/PD of opioids have been repeatedly assessed, using EEG derived parameters, pupil size, and experimental and clinical pain as effect measures. The opioids of the fentanyl group, methadone, morphine, and piritramid, are today well characterized with respect to their PK/PD properties. Alfentanil and remifentanil are very fast equilibrating opioids with equilibration half-lives between plasma and effect site of about 1 minute. They are followed by fentanyl and sufentanil, each with equilibration half-lives of about 6 min. Methadone equilibrates with a half-life of about 8 min. Morphine, in contrast, equilibrates with a half-life of 2-3 h. The slowest opioid with respect to plasma-effect site transfer is M6G, with an equilibration half-life of about 7 h. PK/PD modeling has advanced the understanding of the time course of the clinical effects of opioids after various dosing regimens. It may provide a rational basis for the selection of opioids in clinical circumstances. PK/PD modeling of opioids may also be employed for the design and the interpretation of experiments addressing clinical effects of opioids.
阿片类药物的效应通常与血浆浓度平行,但存在时间上的延迟。这种时间延迟在不同阿片类药物之间有所不同。在阿芬太尼或瑞芬太尼中延迟较小,而在吗啡的活性代谢产物吗啡 - 6 - 葡萄糖醛酸苷(M6G)中延迟非常长。用于模拟这些药代动力学 - 药效学(PK/PD)关系的数学和实验技术是在20世纪70年代末开发的。血浆浓度与效应之间的延迟通过引入一个假设的效应室来解释,该效应室通过具有速率常数k(e0)的一级传递函数与血浆室相连。然后,根据实际效应测量,效应通过标准药效学模型(如S形(“E(max)”)模型或幂模型)与效应部位的浓度相关联。这些原理于1985年首次应用于阿片类药物芬太尼和阿芬太尼。从那时起,阿片类药物的PK/PD已被反复评估,使用脑电图衍生参数、瞳孔大小以及实验性和临床疼痛作为效应测量指标。如今,芬太尼类阿片药物、美沙酮、吗啡和匹立米洞在其PK/PD特性方面已得到很好的表征。阿芬太尼和瑞芬太尼是平衡非常快的阿片类药物,血浆与效应部位之间的平衡半衰期约为1分钟。其次是芬太尼和舒芬太尼,它们的平衡半衰期均约为6分钟。美沙酮的平衡半衰期约为8分钟。相比之下,吗啡的平衡半衰期为2 - 3小时。在血浆 - 效应部位转运方面最慢的阿片类药物是M6G,其平衡半衰期约为7小时。PK/PD建模增进了我们对不同给药方案后阿片类药物临床效应时间进程的理解。它可为临床情况下阿片类药物的选择提供合理依据。阿片类药物的PK/PD建模也可用于设计和解释涉及阿片类药物临床效应的实验。