Churchill R Sean, Kopjar Branko, Fehringer Edward V, Boorman Richard S, Matsen Frederick A
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Advanced Healthcare, S.C., Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005 Apr;34(4):173-6.
We examined the outcomes of using 3 types of humeral prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a modular prosthesis with variable head diameters (MV), a nonmodular prosthesis with variable head diameters (NV), and a nonmodular prosthesis with a fixed head diameter (NF). Patients (N=101) completed self-assessments of shoulder function and health status before surgery and at follow-up between 30 and 60 months after surgery. Outcomes for the MV and NV prostheses did not differ statistically. The NF prosthesis trended toward poorer functional scores. Two Short Form-36 dimensions were statistically significantly lower (P<.05) in the NF group than in the MV and NV groups. These results fail to confirm that humeral component modularity is an important factor in the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty.
我们研究了在全肩关节置换术中使用3种类型的肱骨假体治疗骨关节炎的效果:头直径可变的模块化假体(MV)、头直径可变的非模块化假体(NV)和头直径固定的非模块化假体(NF)。101例患者在手术前以及术后30至60个月的随访时完成了肩部功能和健康状况的自我评估。MV和NV假体的效果在统计学上没有差异。NF假体的功能评分有较差的趋势。NF组的两个简短健康调查问卷36项简表维度在统计学上显著低于MV组和NV组(P<0.05)。这些结果未能证实肱骨假体的模块化是肩关节置换术效果中的一个重要因素。