Rave Klaus, Flesch Sabine, Kühn-Velten W Nikolaus, Hompesch Beate C, Heinemann Lutz, Heise Tim
Profil Institute for Metabolic Research, Neuss, Germany.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):459-64. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.563.
To investigate if coadministration of enalapril alters the metabolic effect of glibenclamide by employing an euglycemic glucose-clamp technique in healthy volunteers.
A double-blind crossover study with nine healthy normotensive volunteers (age 27 +/- 3 y, BMI 23.3 +/- 2.0 kg m(-2); mean +/- SD)-randomly assigned to a 3-day treatment of either 5 mg enalapril or placebo. In the morning of the fourth day, volunteers orally received 3.5 mg glibenclamide together with either 10 mg enalapril or placebo. Blood glucose levels of volunteers were allowed to fall by 10% from fasting levels and were kept constant thereafter by employing a Biostator-based euglycemic glucose clamp.
Coadministration of enalapril-compared with placebo-resulted in a temporarily higher metabolic effect of glibenclamide (AUC GIR(0-120)229 +/- 173 vs 137 +/- 44 mg kg(-1), p < 0.01; mean +/- SD), which lasted from 120 min to 240 min after enalapril administration. In parallel, the maximal metabolic effect of glibenclamide tended to be higher with enalapril (GIR(max)5.2 +/- 1.9 vs 4.1 +/- 1.3 mg kg(-1) min(-1); p = 0.19). However, the total metabolic effect of glibenclamide was almost identical between volunteers taking enalapril or placebo (AUC GIR(0-600)1267 +/- 334 vs 1286 +/- 249 mg kg(-1), ns). In contrast, serum insulin levels, C-peptide levels, and serum glibenclamide profiles were not significantly different between enalapril and placebo.
The results of this study may explain the higher incidence of hypoglycemic episodes observed in patients with type 2 diabetes when taking ACE inhibitors together with sulfonylureas or insulin. ACE inhibitors may cause a temporary increase of the insulin sensitivity, which leads to an increased risk of hypoglycemia under these conditions.
通过在健康志愿者中采用正常血糖葡萄糖钳夹技术,研究依那普利联合用药是否会改变格列本脲的代谢效应。
一项双盲交叉研究,纳入9名健康血压正常的志愿者(年龄27±3岁,体重指数23.3±2.0 kg/m²;均值±标准差),随机分配接受为期3天的5 mg依那普利或安慰剂治疗。在第4天早晨,志愿者口服3.5 mg格列本脲,同时服用10 mg依那普利或安慰剂。使志愿者的血糖水平从空腹水平下降10%,此后通过基于生物人工胰腺的正常血糖葡萄糖钳夹使其保持恒定。
与安慰剂相比,依那普利联合用药导致格列本脲的代谢效应暂时更高(AUC GIR(0 - 120) 229±173 vs 137±44 mg/kg,p < 0.01;均值±标准差),在依那普利给药后120分钟至240分钟持续存在。同时,依那普利使格列本脲的最大代谢效应有升高趋势(GIR(max) 5.2±1.9 vs 4.1±1.3 mg/kg·min⁻¹;p = 0.19)。然而,服用依那普利或安慰剂的志愿者之间,格列本脲的总代谢效应几乎相同(AUC GIR(0 - 600) 1267±334 vs 1286±(此处原文有误,应为249) mg/kg,无显著性差异)。相比之下,依那普利组和安慰剂组之间的血清胰岛素水平、C肽水平和血清格列本脲谱无显著差异。
本研究结果可能解释了2型糖尿病患者同时服用ACE抑制剂与磺脲类药物或胰岛素时低血糖发作发生率较高的现象。ACE抑制剂可能会导致胰岛素敏感性暂时增加,从而在这些情况下增加低血糖风险。